Ubuntu Mate
ubuntu-mate.org
ubuntu-mate.org
I took it out for now because there are other Show HNs in your submission history which make it look like there might have been a misunderstanding of the category.
I wonder why this is popping up on HN’s frontpage.
The direct competitor is XFCE. There are a couple of advantages I personally find over XFCE:
- XFCE has a very severe lack of resources; in worst case, this translates to bugs (even severe) not being fixed for a very long time
- MATE has a very flexible interface (it's actually impressive how they have exactly the opposite philosophy as the GNOME guys)
I've been a longtime XFCE user, but when a couple of bugs started affecting my workflow, I had to leave it.
The worst case has a been a bug where around 25% of the times (if not more), moving files via file manager caused the file manager to crash. This has gone unfixed for a very long time (at least 6 months).
Despite what some people believes, it's not possible to swap the default file manager. While it's technically feasible, DEs have their FM harcoded in some places (ie. Desktop), which causes subtle breakages if the default FM is swapped.
Yup and the next step after that is "title wm" I've recently switched from XFCE to i3mw. So far it' been brilliant !
What a terrible goal. Why not make it just as important as performance?
Perhaps it's time to give MATE a try.
Steam -> Settings -> Steam Play -> Click "Enable Steam Play for all Titles"
It's more like an alternate game library/launcher. I mostly use it to manage emulators, while the rest of my games are through steam or apt.
Edit: Oh I see now I essentially posted in parallel with another question about the Pi running this. Well, there are images for it at least!
I don't think it has even come close to exhausting 8 GB (looks like the 400 only has a 4 GB version?). I just wanted some head room there.
It's Ubuntu without the attempts at lock-in. But Debian Mint (Mate/Cinnamon/Gnome) is pretty OK too.
Personally, I have never understood why anybody installs Ubuntu. Ubuntu was better for a couple of years, right at the start, and has just gotten worse since. The only thing it does better is that an installer that understands current hardware is easier to find. (Debian has it too, but tries to hide it, because "nonfree".)
So, installing Debian Mint is the best of all worlds. Once you have installed Debian Mint, you have regular Debian.
I suspect things have since been fixed, but just something to make sure before you start to use the distro.
As other commenters said, Ubuntu Mate looks like Ubuntu 8.04, of which I too had my first year-long experience using Linux as a daily driver.
Ubuntu mate is a bit faster-moving than the Gnome ("main") Ubuntu in terms of features and neat little fixes.
Martin Wimpress (the main dev of Ubuntu Mate, at least he used to be, now he might be more busy with his other stuff at Canonical...?) has been really trying to push these board-specific images, and IMHO the quality is quite good.
I take it whenever I have to work in a place with bad coffee.
In order to reduce my coffee consumption, I've also tried drinking just warm water. It seems the Chinese recommend it.
It's common to add some green tea leaves and continually top up using the same leaves throughout the day.
[Pero]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caro_%28drink%29?wprov=sfla1
Not a big fan of the MATE DE, but a big fan of the drink.
Maybe I should give the former another try just based on this.
I think adding sugar is disgusting, if you really need to add a small amount of honey. If it tastes like ashtray possibly the water was too hot.
It's unofficial slogan is "One get's used to it" which I think is also very fitting to this project. (Gotten used to Gnome 2, not wanting to switch to something else)
We'll be in a very different world if VLC couldn't even show that it can play mainstream media in it (check out the screenshots over at https://www.videolan.org/vlc/index.html)
Showing a screenshot of copyrighted material is just that, showing a screenshot of copyrighted material. Nothing is downloaded, asserted or even evaluated. For all we know, they can have a license for that material (or live in Germany, where ripping your owned DVD disks is legal).
Two vastly different things.
Sorry there isn't a defense here that would stand up to review.
I understand your paranoia when it comes to the MPAA, and certainly there's nothing physically stopping them from becoming a thorn in someone's side. But let's be clear, they would be in the wrong.
This isn't a YouTube video.
What are they going to do?
Get whatever hosting company their with a boat load of bad press?
You can get high-resolution copies of the Big Buck Bunny film and play it locally in the same what.
> What are they going to do?
Obviously this would be a malicious use of DMCA (as it has been with other cases of open source software), but they could:
* Tie them up in long and expensive legal battles, using the system itself to punish them
* Have their repositories DMCA'd
* Contact their service providers and have them revoke their services
I am just suggesting caution.
Though I find myself wondering whether a screenshot of a .mkv of a copyrighted film is really tactful for a Serious Project aimed at mainstream audience. Chilling effects again. Maybe the user just ripped his own DVD/BR for personal convenience.
Take a look at the VLC homepage. I think VLC is both a serious project and aimed at mainstream audience, but somehow they "got the balls" to use screenshots from Ironman and more.
I agree with your "not succumbing to self-censorship" in general.