https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/iceland-revo...
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/iceland-revo...
¡Ahí Va La Hostia Pues, Inaki!
Europe has so many of these small disputes and treaties that make absolutely no sense what so ever if solely looked at through a modern lens and with no context. As a person born in the US to a European parent it was so odd to see these little details when visiting, even within Spain itself.
Specifically, and relevant to this topic, the Basque Country which has a long history of secession from the Spanish Kingdom. Catalunya is another as is Valencia, due to the horrible violence of the Spanish Civil War, but I had known of that already.
The notion of Autonomous communities is almost antithetical to a nation state/uniter kingdom model, and yet you have it and it exists within the EU. And then when it tries to to exercise those rights it gets people thrown in jail as seen with the successful 2017 Catalan separation vote, that saw its proponents get thrown in jail, beaten and chased by secret police from Madrid and saw its leader Carles Puigdemont fled to Brussels where he still has standing as a member of Parliament somehow. He recently spoke out about the CCP's brash and belligerent violence in Hong Kong, and sought to enact legislation to curtail it.
And then in the South you have Gibraltar, a part of the UK, which is some how autonomous but still physically in the Iberian peninsula.
I wonder if there will be a time when the whole UK vs Iceland thing over Icesave will come up in some obscure way, as the UK put Iceland as a rouge nation on the terrorist watch-list for their refusal to bailout them out in the 2008 financial crises [0].
0: https://www.icelandreview.com/news/iceland%E2%80%99s-preside...
That is a really biased, inaccurate way to describe the legal ramifications of the Procés. I won’t hijack the conversation but people, don’t store this as fact without reading more about it. It’s quite a convoluted situation but it is pretty clear imho that just painting it as “Spain is an oppresive state” is a ridiculous simplification.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slaying_of_the_Spaniards
17th century Iceland during a famine year was a very, very bleak place.
>"The decision to do away with the decree was more symbolic than anything else," Westfjords district commissioner Jonas Gudmundsson told reporters last month. "We have laws, of course, and killing anyone — including Basques — is forbidden these days."
leges posteriores priores contrarias abrogant
The Icelandic legal system operates on the well-established principle that later laws implicitly repeal earlier ones if they conflict[1].So no, killing a Basque person would have been legally no different than killing anyone else.
There was also a law on the books until 1991 that you could legally kill Turks on sight, due to an incident that didn't even involve Turkish people to begin with[2] (Icelanders at the time apparently didn't differentiate them from Algerians).
It was repealed, but not due to any legal practicality. The Turkish national team refused to travel to Iceland unless the law was repealed, so it was struck from the books as a purely symbolic gesture.
At the time, Algeria was under the rule of the Ottoman Empire
Seems the original Vikings were afraid of being Viking'd themselves and put into Law?