No more natural gas in new San Francisco buildings starting next year
sfchronicle.com
sfchronicle.com
CA electrical generation is largely zero- or low-emissions sources, with hydro (for SF, Hetch Hetchy), nuclear, wind, and solar making major contributions.
Also flames can go up the sides of a cooking vessel (specifically thinking a wok here) which you cannot achieve on an induction stove top.
Yes we have renewables to generate electricity but sadly they don't cover demand during the peak time when most cook.
[0] https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=107&t=3 [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combined_cycle_power_plant [2] https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-8904(03)00074-8 [3] https://www.aceee.org/files/proceedings/2014/data/papers/9-7...
About 51% of California electricity consumption is from hydro, nuclear, and renewable sources (https://www.energy.ca.gov/data-reports/energy-almanac/califo...). On top of that, many new electric heating systems would probably use heat pumps, which bring in 2-4 times as much heat into the house relative the the amount of electric energy consumed. In combination, that means that even accounting for transmission and generation losses, using electric instead of gas heat in new construction should result in significant savings in carbon emissions.
Though implications for rebuilding following a future natural disaster might be interesting.