But that's only "4D chess" in the sense that it's a con, run by a conman. A classic con, in the sense that people believe the money donated is for one purpose and it's used for another.
But that's only "4D chess" in the sense that it's a con, run by a conman. A classic con, in the sense that people believe the money donated is for one purpose and it's used for another.
The fantasy that Republican state legislatures could steal the ability of the people of their state to choose the President is just that: fantasy.
There's no reason to believe he'd even want to "crush" the "central banking system." His value is delineated in dollars. If the dollar collapses because central banking has collapsed, he's out most of his fortune.
I don't think I'll ever understand why people think this guy isn't a rich man on the side of the wealthy.
Projection. Everyone in DC is gonna kill themselves if Biden doesn't make it because they know they're gonna either face a firing squad or do life in prison.
> There's no reason to believe he'd even want to "crush" the "central banking system."
Portrait of Andrew Jackson hanging in the Oval Office.
> I don't think I'll ever understand why people think this guy isn't a rich man on the side of the wealthy.
TDS.
The rest of your statement is Q conspiracy nonsense that I will discount out of hand, because I don't debate the unreasonable.
If that's indicative of where you're getting your information, I understand why this is the information you keep presenting.
And as far as a coup attempt, there hasn't been any certification of the election results yet. How could there be a coup when the results aren't yet known?
What did you think about the CIA not being invited to the overseas raid? Methinks the Fed Govt. is learning how to do without them, almost as if the CIA's days are numbered.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-9754011363
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/pennsylvania-election-2020-pat-...
At this point, the best reason I can propose that the CIA wasn't invited to the overseas raid is there wasn't an overseas raid.
This is Comet Ping Pong all over again and I'm watching you fall for it in realtime. It's sad. :(
Get a third-party confirmation on anything Sidney Powell does not say under oath. Even in the quote from her, we can see she is not the primary source on this information. "But I do not know if good guys got it or bad guys got it." She's relaying information she's received second-hand, and since her client is known to believe unsubstantiated conspiracy theory, it's safe to assume a modest probability that the second-hand source is unsubstantiated conspiracy theory.
(Also, as a useful first-pass filter on baloney, any news story that starts with a blast-word like "HUGE!" is probably not going to pass the sniff test for veracity. Rags use blast-words because they have to make up for their lack of integrity with spectacle. News organizations with a reputation to lose just use short-sentence headlines).
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/11/19/heres-how...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dhLYeXG1hgg
4D chess, I'm telling you.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6sVow9l8H4
And I don't know where you get the idea that Powell wasn't part of the President's legal team. Are you calling the President a liar?
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/13278115271231037...
https://www.wsj.com/articles/giuliani-says-sidney-powell-not...
Powell wasn't representing Trump. However, she is definitely on "Team Patriot".
b) Check the dates of the tweet vs. the headline. She was on his legal team; now she's not. Kicked off. Incompetent hiring isn't 4D chess.
Honestly, this is the problem with QAnon. If the only way to conclude the dumbest guy in the room is actually the smartest guy in the room is to assume he's the smartest guy in the room and to work backwards to figure out how that might possibly be true, Occam's Razor suggests we already have our answer.
That's about approach to political patronage, not opposition to central banking.