Hacker News Reader

Comment by dane-pgp | Hacker News Reader

I assume you are being sarcastic and actually think that the UK's "analogue" system of voting is worse because it is slower. Let me assure you that making Westminster votes quicker is not the metric we should be optimising for.

https://boingboing.net/2019/03/26/jfc-fml-jfc.html

> But actually, a group of Swedish MEPs have revealed that they pressed the wrong button, and have asked to have the record corrected. They have issued a statement saying they'd intended to open a debate on amendments to the Directive so they could help vote down Articles 11 and 13.

> We lost on a technicality, and there is no recourse.

View on HN

Counter-example in the UK: where the method of voting is walking into a room with your chums, MPs sometimes have to say that they "accidentally" walked into the wrong room:

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-16746389

It's clear your example that they (Swedish MEPs) were all agreed to vote in this direction, since they each press their own button. It's most likely that they didn't understand the significance of the vote and thought better of it afterwards.

It's their one job, to vote.

I'm not sure if that UK counter-example is as strong as you suggest:

> A spokesman for Mr Stunell, MP for Hazel Grove, said he had voted against the Labour amendment "as he was supposed to" and had gone to get a drink of water for a fellow minister when he found that lobby doors had been "locked".

> "He was temporarily on the wrong side but sanity prevailed and they let him out," he said.

A funny story, but not a legally significant outcome.

Here's another funny example where a UK MP was not able to vote the way they intended: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/snp-mp-locked...

Here, it's suggested that MPs sometimes vote both ways to cancel their own mistake out, although they normally claim that they are taking some nuanced view: https://www.publicwhip.org.uk/boths.php

Not to mention that UK MPs can't vote if they have to be absent for any reason - for example if they have child-care duties.

Your original point was that the UK Commons' system of slow voting is foolproof: it isn't.

I don't think I claimed that the UK's system was "foolproof", my point was just that trying to make it faster likely wouldn't make it any better.

Hilarious that people actually think “I pressed the wrong button” is a valid defence.

How thick are our representatives?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com