Where to Live to Avoid a Natural Disaster
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supervolcano
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megatsunami
[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1958_Lituya_Bay_megatsunami
Super-volcanos are amazing in how widespread their destruction is.
The Northeast has a decent balance. Our natural disaster is the winter storm, which are harmless in comparison and, at least, pretty afterward.
I think the West Coast ranks so highly only because earthquakes are so rare. Unlike hurricanes and tornadoes, which seem to claim lives every year in the US.
The danger is if you live in a trailer park without shelter, on land that has a history of tornadoes... The actual danger seems to be a problem of poverty. :(
The odds of a tornado occurring are slim already, and the odds of being impacted by it even slimmer. I think it helps being right at the edge of the tornado risk map where storms are already weak.
Aside: I've had a hypothesis for quite a while that the land most fought-over in land wars (or holy wars) has extremely low value on such a map. I'd love to see the data to confirm/refute that.
Caused the eastern front of WWII. The Ukraine and Kazakhstan have extremely fertile soil. Holy wars are maybe fought over useless land, but the deadliest military campaign ever was fought in large parts because of good soil.
When we moved here from California I was struck about how much people in the Willamette Valley love to talk about how the "Big One" will come and how there's going to be a big Tsunami. Well, maybe, but in the meantime it's been the most temperate climate you can imagine. The worst thing we get is the occasional ice storm but nothing like our neighbors in Portland.
But I don't see wildfires in their list of disasters.