too slow for who? in what sense? would quarterly be sufficient for your metrics?
> enable real time, continuous feedback for everyone > making feedback part of the everyday conversation
that's what we use weekly stand ups and 1:1s for. continuous feedback may also not be welcomed and/or be distracting from actually getting work done. not sure since I haven't tried the tool or seen a presentation on a particular use case.
> light-weight, informal feedback on people's presentations, projects, or even performance
personally after someone has set up a meeting or provided a presentation that was useful I make sure to praise them or thank them at the end of the video call. not sure if this is a problem for others? In terms of performance, that is a tricky one, since it can feel personal. It requires a empathetic manager to get right. Maybe a tool CAN help?
> more importantly, use it to give constructive criticism to help them grow incrementally
I'm all for sensitive conversations to be f2f. I can see potential use as a forum for someone who is explicitly requesting feedback. You know the old adage about unsolicited advice.
> Request feedback from multiple channels or people in one go. No need to ping or remind them, we automatically send reminders on slack.
Seems like a busy manager type feature?
I do want to note that a product like achievers accomplishes a similar thing (recognizing peers) once a month, and you get rewards, which is a nice perk.
> We look forward to learn from the maker community here and are open and eager to get YOUR feedback to help us grow as makers.
Hope I wasn't too harsh.