I am all for writers taking a balanced perspective, especially when it comes to something as subjective and controversial as programming languages.

However, I do find it a bit frustrating when someone writes a 10 page article and concludes with "you can use either". It's actually not helpful to the reader, because they do have differences, which you've talked about extensively in the preceding 10 pages. If they were identical, you wouldn't need the article, and OBVIOUSLY you can use either.

Indeed, in the post above he made valid points such as Go may be thought to prioritise speed of development over speed to execution when compared to Rust.

It's absolutely fine to state an opinion at the end of an article which is clearly on a subjective passage.