Secondly, his DNA didn't match the missing person's database, which you are getting your "match" from.
There's no reason to be defensive. You've done nothing wrong. Wrong starts only if it is impossible for one to accept that one's theory might not be correct. That can ultimately end in throwing off the real investigation, if one were aggressive enough.
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/cognitive-service...
It I put in the two reddit images, and it says they don't match, but its not very confident. I've tried with some older family photos, on with kids growing up and those matched well, (even though 4 years difference). I does seem to work pretty well in general.
Verification result: The two faces belong to different people. Confidence is 0.09848.
Edit: From the missing persons website:
> Last seen on shrimping boat in the Texas area in the Gulf of Mexico.
Seems somewhat unlikely that's him.
I'm sure it's not though ;-)