Hacker News Reader

I read the entire article, twice. Nonetheless, the confusion that set in initially never disappeared. What is the takeaway here? What is specifically advisable in order to facilitate developer happiness? I get that it’s important to invest in tools and training - no mystery there. But something more concrete was expected. What did I miss?

View on HN

Nothing really. It started with a question, strayed off to discussing some metrics about cost/loss of inefficient onboarding and closed off with vague hint that onboarding is important to get devs productive, failing to mention/promote that they are an onboarding specialist agency.

Hi thanks for the feedback! Indeed the article aims to discuss the highly coupled correlation between long-term training and the right tools to a happy and productive team. By something concrete, do you mean a list of recommended tools?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com