You’ve got some heavily inaccurate assumptions about how the virus spreads. Most infected people spread to nobody, even without restrictions. The bulk of spread happens in clusters in poorly ventilated indoor environments. The household attack rate is something like 17%. That’s people living in the same house. 83% of people don’t get it!
To have a sustained outbreak breach quarantine, you’d need:
1. An infected person to arrive (probably less than 2% of arrivals are infected)
2. This infected person must breach isolation protocol. (Most people are honest or fear or penalties)
3. They must be infectious when they breach protocol (you are only very infectious for five days or so)
4. They must go to a place apt to superspreading (not everyone breaching isolation will go to a bar or a party)
5. The newly infected must all remain asymptomatic and not seek testing
6. Once community spread is detected, the government must delay taking action, fail to contact trace, and avoid implementing new measures
This is obviously possible. Outbreaks have happened in Australia, Vietnam, New Zealand, New Brunswick. But it is much, much less likely than you suggest, which is why you’re being downvoted: you’re completely failing to consider the system dynamics.
And in each case step 6 has put things back on track pretty quick. Australia is the exception, but there the local government was slow to respond and so they needed a big, long lockdown. Other areas responded quickly and so the necessary lockdown has been short.
I’m in the Atlantic bubble. Frankly it leaks like a sieve and yet it’s still been enough to keep out infections for now.
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2020/09/k-overloo...