>> MicroStrategy’s revenues have barely grown over the past decade, from $455 million in 2010 to $486 million last year.

Totally agree, and this line from the article jumped out at me. So -- during a giant tech boom -- the company was unable to grow revenues...and now it is pivoting to a pseudo-asset management company with a singular bet on BTC?

As a shareholder, why would I want this? If I need BTC exposure, I can buy BTC directly, I dont need it co-mingled with a software firm.

How does the board allow this to happen?