Jack Ma's Ant Group set for record $34B market debut
bbc.co.uk
bbc.co.uk
https://www.ncuscr.org/media/podcast/uschinainsights/kai-fu-...
Orlins: You focus a lot on, kind of Alipay or WeChat Pay. How does that change the landscape for AI in China versus the United States, where we still are heavily reliant on a credit card system that seems quite old and outdated when you're in China?
Lee: It's a very unique opportunity for China to leapfrog. The U.S. had the world's most leading transaction tool, which was the credit card, but it became outdated. It charges too much, it's inconvenient, it's only customer to merchant. In China, with WeChat and Alipay, anybody can pay anybody. We can do micro payments and there are no fees, almost no fees, so the 2% extra charge is almost like a tax on the American economy charged by the credit cards. But with respect to AI, now everybody, including WeChat and Alibaba, but also, if you build an app, you know who your customers are, and what they paid and why. And if you're a retail shop and people scanned you, you know who pays you and why. There are even beggars in the street holding up a sign, "Scan me and give me money," and they know who paid them and why. So I think this is creating a huge amount of data that will help AI.
they seem to have forgotten about europe where they have the same credit card networks, but capped interchange fees to around 0.3%.
>[...] So I think this is creating a huge amount of data that will help AI.
This already happens to an extent in the US. Your credit card transactions are sold to data brokers for analytics/market research purposes.
To an extent. US cc transaction data are batched. Alipay provides more agile context by integrating location data real time.
to what extent? They might take a few days to settle, but the authorizations show up in my bank almost immediately. For all intents and purposes they're real time.
>Alipay provides more agile context by integrating location data real time.
The usefulness of this is questionable. Merchant terminals are mostly fixed, so correlating a merchant id/name to a physical location isn't too hard. Apple pay already has this, where it will show a map of where the transaction happened if you click into a transaction. This works even without location services enabled on your phone.
Think 600 million integrated surveillance cameras.
Think every aspect of consumer behaviour, pre and post every sale of every magnitude and every configuration, being fed through AI sieves every moment of every day, everywhere.
Every transaction I make nets me 2-5% 'cashback'. Great for me since I get 5% back even on things like my electric bill and Internet.
But for everyone else paying cash at places where credit is primarily received, they're basically being fined for my benefit.
Obviously I think the fees are pointless.
It's silly not to pay for everything on credit cards here, when you can get 3-5% back on anything with the right card. That's around $4k/year if you spend $100k before even accounting for doubling on some cards and other benefits like travel vouchers, Uber credits, and free insurance coverage. (Minus a $600-$1000 a year in annual card fees for high end cards.)
There used to be a 3% cashback on everything card with no limit. Now 2% is the best and difficult for most people to get.
You can get 5% credit back with an Amazon Prime card but only on Amazon.
Most other 3% or more back are either limited to a niche category and/or capped. (Like 6% back on groceries, but only for the first $6k).
So unless you're spending like 200k net a year on life expenses, it's pretty easy to get the max returns.
On the other hand, with debit cards money is withdrawn from your account when a fraudulent purchase is made, and you need to wait for your bank to complete an investigation to reimburse you. They also tend to have rather stricter reporting standards in that if you don't report fraud promptly, you might be stuck with (some) liability.
Either way you'll typically get your money back, but the hassle is much reduced with credit cards.
If a merchant posts a fraudulent transaction against a credit card, you'll most likely get your money back. If a merchant posts a fraudulent transaction against a debit card, you might not get your money back.
More dangerously, if your debit card credentials are skimmed and used to withdraw money from your account by any means other than the retail debit-card payment system, you won't get your money back.
How in the world would a tpical person spend that much? That's over $8000/month with credit cards!
Also... aren't your 5% cards capped at like $1500 spend per quarter ($500/month)?
Do you use cash back cards in your own life, and does your usage even vaguely match the numbers you suggested here?
If given a choice between paying 100% and being done, or paying 105% and getting the 5% back later, almost no one would chose the 105% option. (I know it doesn't actually work this way, but it's still a good illustration.)
Additionally, that program necessarily adds some cost, which is just rolled into higher prices that you (and everyone else) pay.
All that said, I completely agree with your point. I wish credit card reward schemes would just go away.
And, of course, if you don't pay your bill in full each month, then you're likely looking at 15-20% or more (APR) on whatever balance you left unpaid.
How though? The 5% back is not a rebate coming from the merchant, it's coming from the card issuer. Don't they (generally -- barring special agreements for specific cards) get the same amount of money regardless of what cards people use?
I think 5% is a special case that's limited to specific vendors or products, I'm not aware of any general rebate higher than 2%.
I know Stripe and Square and other companies have come along now that charge the same fees regardless of the type of card - but note that they're all above 2%.
I think the only difference now is that Stripe/Square/etc. keep the difference as profit when someone pays with a non-rewards card, instead of the vendor. (But, in their defense, they're able to negotiate lower rates than I was ever able to get on my own.)
But, online, eg PayPal, has the same-price rule.
Similarly, consumers also like the cash back/rewards game. Plus there are benefits to having an arbiter when dealing with an unknown party in a transaction.
Funny people nowadays mentioning "political will", somehow this reminds me how domesticated Chinese people think about changing society: don't bother, the government does not want to do that...
Truly sad...
A better and more realistic solution in the US is the personal bank to bank transfers people can easily do in the UK/EU.
Two is a lot more than one, for competition purposes, but it's hardly a wide open market where "anyone can compete", and it's the same as the number of major consumer payment networks in China (Alipay and Wechat pay).
Yes and I make about $1500-$2000 in cash back a year using my various branded credit cards. How can you do that with Alipay?
Does Alipay offer theft protection, travel insurance, or price protection for buyers? My Amex and Chase cards do.
What about disputes and fraud on Alipay?
Rewards for payments and unregulated interchange fees need to die. They are a financial transaction tax on everyone.
"Your reward points come from interest charged to poor people" is both gross (in that some people are placated by it) and incorrect.
It's just another regressive tax on poor Americans, sadly.
(Rewards cards similarly offer insignificant benefits or are paid for by increases elsewhere.)
If you pay your balance off each month, these cards are great. I enjoy thousands/year in benefits after fees.
Delta Amex with 100,000+ miles is used for automated bills, $95 fee. Pre-covid I made back the $95 fee by saving on checked bags etc. Will be cancelled in January due to covid.
I don't know if you can do the same with your Delta Amex but FYI.
Which are essentially funded through merchant fees. CC's will gladly give you $2k in cash back for all of the fees that it charges merchants. If those fees didn't exist, your overall cost of goods would likely be ~3% cheaper.
Looks like Alipay has disputes and fraud: https://intl.alipay.com/ihome/user/protect/memberProtect.htm
There are two major networks, but many vendors of credit cards, with very difficult qualities from each other.
If you have any problems, it's the vendors you will deal with and who decide things like your credit limit, how often that's revised (up or down), whether payments are blocked and how to unblock them, how you are notified about transactions, whether paying off the card turns into credit instantly or takes a few days, your interest rates, whether the interest is applied immediately or not, whether you have balance transfer and money transfer, whether you have 0% transfers, cashbacks and other deals, and the kind of customer service you get (whether it's on the phone or forced to be via chat, whether they answer quickly and are helpful or take forever and are not), and whether their website and app are down "for maintenance" regularly.
Almost everything you'd care about is up to the vendor of which there are many, not the network.
Personal bank to bank transactions, at least in Canada, still involves a lot of trouble.
What is missing is an effortless way of asking to pay, like by scanning a QR code. Contactless payments using NFC in cards and phones do not quite cut it, and require a terminal.
Paypal.me works great on the web as a clickable link, even though the commission is several percent (don't remember exactly), not the 0.3% which Alipay boasts.
I think QR is slightly worse since I have to open my camera app, or open my payment app and select camera, vs just waving my watch/phone at a terminal.
Things like metro payments are 100% doable with NFC and would be an awful nightmare with QR.
As someone who has visited China, it truly feels like stepping back in time when coming to the U.S. with regards to payments.
weird, must be a regional thing. both NFC cards and apple pay are pretty reliable for me. as for speed, I don't see how getting out your credit card and waving it next to a terminal can be slower than getting out your phone, unlocking it, opening wechat, selecting the qr scanner, lining up the camera, waiting for it to focus/scan, and confirming the transaction.
Just like the phone made wrist watches and portable music devices obsolete, it's also made the wallet obsolete. I agree that both NFC and QR code are equally convenient (although obviously QR codes are more accessible because they work on all phones and no special scanning devices are required), but I think the main issue is with NFC in a card versus NFC in a phone. The phone is always going to be more convenient, because people today are rarely - if ever - without their phone.
Regarding NFC, I've just seen too many times of having to put the phone in the right place in the right orientation to get the communication to work, and then it still takes time to make the payment. It's faster than credit cards when it just works but slower when it doesn't. And Alipay and WeChat are faster than both.
In China, you don't need a wallet. You just need a phone. So you get used to knowing what you need. There's an initial learning curve, but then you can be paying and biking around and everything else with just your phone.
The answer is they don't do that - and they do it the other way around. The user shows THEIR QR code to the merchant (or automated kiosk).
Which means they still need a terminal - and it's going to be slower than NFC.
And NFC works when my battery dies.
Pretty easy to fake a receipt.
QR codes seem to have largely supplanted cash and credit cards in mainland China, whatever hypothetical downsides they might have. And the very limited hypothetical advantages of NFC (it's unclear to me what they actually are, but let's grant they exist) don't compensate for the fact that an expensive terminal is needed, so NFC isn't displacing QR codes in the near future.
NFC terminals aren’t expensive - especially since they can be a cheap phone now.
QR without validating payment received is probably only viable up to maybe $10USD before the risk of being defrauded is too high.
I bet you’ll find lots of one way QR shops have a phone that they verify they’ve received payment on anyway.
And, yeah, most places do verify based on another phone.
China netizen population is estimated around 900 million. So essentially all adults in Urban and many in rural excepting small kids. Generally for the elderly, their kids or grand kids will help.
Some merchants, like street merchants or drivers, will simply have their code printed out. You scan it and pay them and they get a notification on their phone or tablet that you've paid. Other places, like at bigger restaurants, have QR screen readers that will scan the purchaser's phone.
Either way, I don't see what you're getting at. The terminal is the phone in many cases, and other cases, there is a terminal in the sense of an integrated scanner system, but why does that matter? For the user it is much more convenient and faster. It's essentially instant, and I have never waited for the amount of time it takes for a credit card or NFC payment method to process. Further, it allows basically anyone to have this method because, again, the terminal is your phone and can be so for both parties in the transaction.
> And NFC works when my battery dies.
So what? You can charge your phone essentially anywhere in China.
By and large when I've used these systems, the vendor just checks they received the correct amount of payment in their app. It's largely immediate
I think I need to restate the well-known: the gulf between reasonably easy and zero effort is quite large, and crossing it changes a lot in user behavior.
Pointing a camera at something that deducts money from you seems extremely ripe for abuse, what’s to stop someone from putting fake QR code’s over real ones and hijacking payments?
I'd say that paying with a contactless card has a problem here, an NFC credit card lacks a confirmation button, and the one on the terminal is controlled by the receiving party.
That doesn't solve the "Stripe, Inc" issue. https://web.archive.org/web/20170715000000*/stripe.ian.sh
How would that work? If someone somehow put a fake QR code over a merchant's real one, the merchant or person you're paying would not get a notification when you scanned their code to pay them. Thus, both parties involved in the transaction would be alerted to the situation immediately. The wrong QR code would be tied to someone's account and be easily found by the system.
In that it doesn't shut off nearly a half of all smartphones, which don't have NFC (iphone has nfc, but that's a long story)
Back when AliPay and others were scaling up not too many phones had NFC.
However, more importantly, QR is way better from merchant's stand point. A static QR code is a thing of beauty. A tiny mom-and-shop merchant could take a printout and stick it up on their physical store front. It allowed AliPay to onboard of hundreds of thousands of merchants with minimal or no operations team on the ground. This strategy was almost 100% replicated in India by Paytm and their ilk. It was incredible to see even the smallest of shops with a printed QR codes stuck to their push carts, rickety shops etc.,
Or they go the other way and they’re scanning your QR code.
Basically, it isn’t actually better than NFC, just different. And maybe a little worse for speed, but better for donations or things that anything is better than nothing.
At the next level up, of course, vendors will have their own phone so they can check their notifications to make sure that a payment went through. And that is a big step forward for vendors in developing countries - there's no risk of receiving counterfeit currency with electronic transactions.
If the currency is good enough to fool a street vendor, it’s probably good enough to spend with their suppliers. Not like they’re sticking it in a bank. I suspect those street vendors are also not accepting bills so large they’re worth counterfeiting.
Chargeback fraud of course being more likely with credit card payments - but again, unlikely for small vendor transactions. It’s not worth it for anyone.
The argument that people don’t carry cash anymore is certainly real enough - and the beggars/window washer at a red light types are the most impacted rather than real merchants.
https://www.globalcosmeticsnews.com/visa-tap-to-phone-to-exp...
Right now it's just "out of sight, out of mind" and the full capabilities of what is possible with aggregated data is just not apparent to your average person.
AI, surveillance capitalism, manipulation and so on have been in pop-culture and news for years now, 'the social dilemma' just aired on netflix and a lot of people seem to have watched it, there's a documentary about 'big data' on TV every month, every other sci-fi movie has it as a plot point, we're all aware of it. People are genuinely indifferent about it. People will complain about it in theoretic debates but the number of people who actually delete the apps off their phone is basically zero, which tells you what you need to know.
Perhaps they don't care because they are accustomed and desensitized to it?
In China, technically anyone can setup a "business" account on Alipay with just one tap and then start to collect payment right way, the story is completely different if you have to deal with banks. Then with all that, you add the fact that not everybody here uses credit card which raises the bar for credit card adaption up yet again.
I'd recommend people who interested about the related development to checkout the DC/EP project. Which is aimed to be an alternative to Alipay and WeChat Pay, but backed by the banks.
No economy is 'suffering' because businesses have to 'deal with a bank'. It could be smoother, but it's mostly not a big deal.
Since the world has 'gone digital' the '2%' system setup became the natural medium and it's possibly a bigger problem than Google and FB, it's just that nobody wants to talk about it.
So, what was the market opportunity Stripe exploited if not that "dealing with banks" is painful?
Second, they didn't invent anything new, they just made the process a easier. There are plenty of non-Stripe solutions you can use today.
To a teenage software developer without business exposure or experience, who thinks 'opening a merchant account' is a big deal, or that 'incorporating' is a big deal, Stripe seems like some kind of magic.
But none of that is hard. People do it all the time. Your plumber, hairdresser and local cafe probably have some kind of incorporation and collect/pay a VAT and business tax. It's not rocket science. You can usually do it online in a few minutes.
'Dealing with banks' is not a problem with scale. 2% of every transaction however, and the underlying power structures that want to keep it that way ... that's a problem.
I'm in the UK.
Setting up a company is easy. The last time I did it, took an hour or so of filling out forms online, but it's cheap and a few hours later, or the next day, you have a legal company.
Registering for tax/VAT etc takes longer. The forms took me longer to fill and the system took a few weeks to proceed through each step (codes sent in the post, figures in online forms checked by a person, etc), but you can start trading before they are done if you follow the transitional arrangements.
Getting a bank account is much slower. Recently I did it with Starling, because they offered a much faster online process than the high street banks. It still took a frustrating 4 working days, with support messages back and forth because they kept challenging me for "proof" that I was a business. Having a company was not sufficient proof. Lots of money laundering requirements, having to prove the type of business, having to provide evidence of online presence, etc.
I temporarily altered my LinkedIn profile (which I saw they did check) to satisfy their requirements.
The time before that was a high street bank, Barclays. The process took about 2 months. They interviewed me twice, and another of the directors, and conducted background checks on everyone. In the interviews they asked a lot of challenging questions about the nature of the business, even though it was a non-profit with 5 independent directors, handling only a small amount of money.
Other people, in more regular types of small business (plumber, hairdresser, cafe etc) report that getting business accounts can often take 1-2 months, and be quite frustrating because you want to start trading and that's a bottleneck.
Merchant accounts (for taking credit cards) are no longer necessary because of services like Paypal and Stripe. It used to be that merchant accounts were a challenge to get as a small business, because they didn't serve early businesses.
But even now, with Paypal, last time I did it, they set a cap on £1000/year of transactions until certain documentation was received by them. Despite sending them 10 different forms of business documentation at their request, they were never satisfied, and so that business stopped using Paypal, relegating it to a handful of users that couldn't pay any other way.
However another massive issue except the fees is data flow. I don't need US corporations to know about all my transactions that otherwise do not relate to them at all.
It should be in the interest of all countries to have a payment scheme that is not reliant on the US or another massive foreign power. Thankfully, many countries do have their own scheme, though it seems Kenya unfortunately doesn't.
Still it’s being priced by Chinese bankers at such a ridiculous level that it is almost certain to work out very poorly for buyers.
If you aren’t paying, then you are the product.
FYI They both sell your data to brokers.
1. https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/02/07/we-cant-tell-if-chinese...
2. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jul/25/china-business...
3. https://justthenews.com/world/asia/made-china-owned-china-20...
4. https://thediplomat.com/2019/12/politics-in-the-boardroom-th...
This took me 1 minute to assemble. There's a lot more...
It doesn't IPO in Western countries anyway.
Frankly speaking, in a country such like China where capital is strictly controlled, Ant's existence itself is pretty significant.
2) Jack is one of > 91.2M party members in China. As are most high-ranking managers and professionals, it's simply a fact of life. [2]
Nothing about 1 or 2 makes Alibaba Group or Ant a state owned enterprise (SOE) more than any other company in China. Everything in the world need _not_ be late stage capitalist democracy. There are plenty of ways to attain success and happiness. Lastly, Ant isn't even IPOing in the West. If you disagree then vote with your wallet (or don't).
[1]: https://www.alibabagroup.com/en/ir/pdf/160614/12.pdf
[2]: https://www.statista.com/topics/1247/chinese-communist-party...
I would have expected being a party member to just be the default in order for anyone to do anything of substance in China, but he comes across extremely poorly in that interview.
So poorly, that I find it more likely that the companies are being propped up/operated by the government than someone like him could successfully build/run them.
Maybe I'm indexing too much on that, but watch it for yourself, definitely weird.
To your second point: doing business in China is partially owed to the niche that the government carves for you. Look at the debacle of Ofo vs Mobike. You need to grow at all costs until you can overtake competition then you're protected.
> doing business in China is partially owed to the niche that the government carves for you...You need to grow at all costs until you can overtake competition then you're protected.
I suspect this protection is what allows people to succeed that would otherwise fail in a real competition. In that interview he comes across like an empty suit/figurehead. It wasn't a huge surprise to me that they got rid of him.
"Everything in the world need _not_ be late stage capitalist democracy. There are plenty of ways to attain success and happiness."
- You meant to say "early stage" and of course there are many ways to attain success and happiness. That's why we allow people to make their own choices, elect their own representatives, and speak freely. We don't force them into accepting one single system, like they do in China. In America, we believe humans have inalienable rights that the government has no authority to usurp. The government exists subserviently to protect our rights to pursue happiness as we see fit, provided we don't infringe on the rights of others. If you want to go live in a communist community within a free society, you're more than welcome to share your income with a group of people. What you have in China is totalitarianism / authoritarianism, which we believe is axiomatically immoral, as it removes option for people to decide on their own, it removes the inalienable rights that all humans naturally have at birth. Don't you agree that you own your physical body, and you own the fruits of your labor? Don't you think you have the right to express criticism against leaders? From where exactly do they derive their authority? It's not by elected mandate. I would love to hear why you think restricting freedom and being a cheerleader for totalitarianism / authoritarianism can (even in theory) lead to greater happiness. Thank you!
It was a good learning experience though to be honest. Since then, I stay away from Chinese stocks on principle. I was lucky enough to be able to sell off my shares without losing anything this time, but who knows what could have happened.
https://www.uscc.gov/research/chinese-companies-listed-major...
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/05/19/nasdaq-to-tighten-listing-ru...
And sadly, as usual, fund managers will face zero consequences.
It's open source and MIT licensed.
I like that AntD has a more 'enterprise' feel than other component libs that tend to be based on material design.
The history repeats itself endlessly.
Firstly, all of the proposed courses of action involve giving more power to the US, which shall I remind you, kills millions of people in wars like it's nothing. It's not clear at all that decreasing China's power but increasing that of the US will do any good to anyone. Just in Iraq, the US killed more people than anyone accuses China of imprisoning illegitimately. So unless you can find a way to reduce China's power without also increasing that of the US, no one outside of those under US propaganda or interest will want to do much of anything.
Secondly, China is a nuclear armed country. Intervening in their domestic affairs is not easily done.
Finally, comparing the CCP to the NSDAP is frankly absurd. They are not comparable. The Nazi party wanted to kill around a third of the world's population and enslave another third. The CCP is accused, at worst, to be trying to change the culture of one of their provinces using inhumane tactics and torture, which sadly is just par for the course for the world in general.
Funny how our 2 leading candidates, AntDesign and BluePrint, both come from less than "ideal" companies with similar baggage, though from opposite sides of the spectrum!
Too bad it won't be available to non-Chinese users anytime soon.
call me a luddite but that's one innovation that I can do without.
When you first enter China, you have to let a machine scan your face (IIRC fingerprints too?), and locals have to scan their (RFID-enabled) IDs to enter airports or train stations; so they seem to really have total control.
I can't imagine how an international traveller could in good faith single out China as having "total control" on these grounds in a way that is qualitatively different from Western countries.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/travel/airline-news/2019/08/1...
Some flights from Europe to US do this at the gate -- there's no opt-out. I remember flying AA from AMS and everybody had to get scanned before boarding (CBP agents were present).
But I think one of the main things is also that you can connect it to your bank account, so it essentially becomes what a debit card is.
Advantages:
* cheap, no need for a dedicated terminal
Disadvantages:
* requires internet connection for both parties (credit cards only require the merchant to be connected)
* cellphone is a single failure point (eg. losing it, battery running out, dropping it), whereas you can carry spare credit cards
* scanning is worse ux than tapping
It literally takes $0 and seconds to setup cashless payments
In China it's quite common for the merchant to have a static printed-out QR code for receiving payment. This requires a connection only for the payer (and merchants will often have WiFi available, so you're likely to be able to connect one way or another). These merchants tend to just trust you when you pay and then show them the "paid" screen on your phone. You could fake it, but I guess in general people don't, and the "paid" screen does include the merchant's chosen profile image, so you would have to have done your homework to fake it.
> scanning is worse ux than tapping
This is really true. When I lived in Shanghai it was pretty common to be stuck behind someone at the metro turnstile who was trying to use the stupid QR scanning thing to get in. Contactless is much smoother, but at one time QR code was the only way to use your mobile device to get into Shanghai's metro. Now Apple Pay supports the Shanghai transit card.
"for the same amount of security" should be implied. If we're talking about what's possible, credit cards can also be processed fully offline by using an imprinter (eg. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Credit_card_imprinter.JPG).
>These merchants tend to just trust you when you pay and then show them the "paid" screen on your phone. You could fake it, but I guess in general people don't, and the "paid" screen does include the merchant's chosen profile image, so you would have to have done your homework to fake it.
I feel like it's a case of abuse being so rare that they don't care.
Scanning is better than tapping as it can be done from range.
How does this work? Do you manually compose a text message to alipay with the payment information?
>Scanning is better than tapping as it can be done from range.
In what context would this be advantageous? If you're at a supermarket checkout, you're already standing close enough to the cashier that you can easily tap/swipe. The same applies to most other situations I can think of.
The other way around - the internet-lacking vendor has a static QR printout (or one-time code) which the buyer scans, keys in the amount, then pays with their internet connection. Vendor gets SMS receipt.
Either way, I do think one of the two parties needs to have internet for a payment to successfully go through.
Plenty of corner cases which collectively add up to a majority of cases.
Pandemic: you don't want to get too close to the checkout, so you can do it from a six foot distance.
Retail locations with limited space: all you need is a flat wall to put a QR code on, and you can put it up in multiple areas. You could even put it on the floor or hang it from the ceiling.
Forced serialization: multiple people can scan a QR code simultaneously, while the NFC nearness requirement means that only one person can tap at once.
Restaurant table: put a QR code on the menu, scan.
Websites on your desktop or laptop: can't tap, but can scan as usual
That's all just talking about payer UX, not even considering seller UX. QR codes are cheaper and more flexible than NFC.
And, most of all, the fact that QR codes work in such a wide range of scenarios enables the biggest advantage: ubiquity. When they're ubiquitous, they become a single payment interface that you can assume will be available no matter where you go, which is game changing.
Ubiquity.
I can't assume that every place, even in the most sophisticated cities in the US, will support NFC payments. Most don't, actually. So I still have to carry around a credit card and use it, with all the inconvenience and security issues associated with it.
Also, that cheapness allows for user experiences that are prohibitively expensive for NFC. E.g., paying at your table after eating.
You can save them in the app and not have to scan every time too. It's pretty common at people's regular lunch places for them to pay while they wait in line. There's no deep technical reason this couldn't be implemented with the card system either, of course.
The company I work for follows several practices Google and Spotify follow, even though they don't make sense for us.
So your company is cargo culting "thought leadership" from Google, you can see it's a poor fit and you're still there because...? Let me guess, the money?
As with the 996 stuff, if you're not happy to work in those conditions then don't.
And the way they did it was so shady. They basically revealed to the world that they are able and willing to replace the content on any website and as a user then you'll have no idea if they did it or not (for instance, one of the browsers made the repo visible but prevented people from starring the repo). CCP could easily order all these browsers (which come pre-installed with their cheap phones) to rewrite the content on any website. Imagine them rewriting the content of Wikipedia articles, Twitter posts, Google search results, hijacking download links to download software bundled with spyware (e.g. if you were to download Chrome), etc.
If they're willing to engage in such shady behaviour and break all users' trust just because they didn't like a repo complaining about long work hours, then imagine what they would do with all your financial transactions. My god. The fact that we're allowing these companies into our markets truly saddens me.