Sorry, I'm afraid I don't understand your position at all.
My point is that, like EMH, none of these are pretending to be the "be all end all solution to all models" and it's obviously silly to pretend otherwise? So it seems you're agreeing with me?
My point is that, like EMH, none of these are pretending to be the "be all end all solution to all models" and it's obviously silly to pretend otherwise? So it seems you're agreeing with me?
I think that's the whole crux of the paper - the people informing how we structure our economy shouldn't consider EMH doctrine.