Hacker News Reader

Sorry you had that experience. Honestly though it sounds more like a bad DM, or a mismatch in what kind of game everyone wanted to play, than anything inherent to DnD.

Story in an RPG comes out of the choices the players make in response to the world. DnD enables that just as much as any other system. And nothing about putting yourself in your character’s shoes and making choices requires taking an improv class or talking in funny voices, so don’t worry about that.

But a bad DM who treats every non-combat encounter like a video game cutscene can be a bad DM in any system.

That said, like another poster mentioned, 4th edition did tilt heavily towards being a skirmish wargame dressed as an rpg. 5e is much better in that regard.

But if you want to get away from swords and sorcery fantasy and if Lovecraftian horror does anything for you, check out Call of Cthulhu. The rules are straightforward, creating characters is easy, and it usually focuses on unraveling a mystery rather than completing a Conan the Barbarian style quest. Combat is de-emphasized, because characters that keep getting into fights with unspeakable eldritch horrors tend to have short life expectancies.

Do you know what edition of D&D you were playing? 4e was heavily focused around gridded combat and it turned many players off, as tactics and math overshadowed the role playing.

If you haven’t given 5e a try yet, do so - it’s substantially less crunchy that previous releases and frees combat from the tyranny of the grid if the group wishes to play it without.

As far as balance between combat and story, that’s all up to content. Published adventures tend to be very heavy on dungeon crawls, while many homebrew adventures lean more towards RP.

I don’t know which edition it was. But I think you are right about content influencing how a system is played. StartPlaying.Games pays good attention to this btw. The descriptions and info about level of RP, Puzzle and Combat are very useful.

That said, from reading about it, I do think that the mentioned Cypher System will be a better fit for me

Oh yeah! I would check out systems like Monster of the Week

https://startplaying.games/join-game/intro-to-monster-of-the...

https://startplaying.games/join-game/thieves-in-the-night-16...

Or Cypher System https://startplaying.games/join-game/black-rain-ripples-[cyp...

Both are pretty fun systems!

Big +1 to both of those.

The Cypher System is probably closer to D&D, but the combat / rules / stats are a lot more streamlined, so in my experience it's easier to jump between narrative and action.

Monster of the Week is a bigger (and welcome!) departure from the traditional TTRPG formula, and is probably closer to what GP was looking for -- it's a very light "game" system on top of the players building a story together with the DM.

Monster of the Week is one of a _bunch_ of quality spins on the Powered by the Apocalypse/Apocalypse World engine. They span a ton of genres, and they all share relatively simple, story-driven mechanics:

http://apocalypse-world.com/pbta/

https://www.drivethrurpg.com/browse.php?filters=44825_0_0_0_...

The d&d lineage (from old school dungeons and dragons, via advanced dungeons and dragons, through pathfinder and d20 system and on to 5e) can all be played without grid and all that. For a "ready" example see the call of cthulu d20 edition/remake.

But in a pick-up game with strangers, and with the current "mainstream" d&d - you probably have to be lucky to enter a campaignwwhere you develop a character as rich as Elminister or the Lord of Waterdeep.

For systems that encourage story-telling - I'd look to Cypher as mentioned by others - and of course white wolf's Storyteller system. It can be used for almost anything - but Hunter and Mage are probably most beginner friendly for players. Beware that mage can be quite mind bending.

A wiki from our current mage campaign: https://radio-noir.fandom.com/wiki/Radio_Noir_Wiki

Old blog from a previous storyteller/mage inspired original setting:

http://thebookofworlds.blogspot.com/p/world-of-argos.html

Ed: I've also heard good things about:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castle_Falkenstein_(role-pla...

And for a fun ruleset (but slightly dated setting) check out Underground! https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Underground_(role-playing_ga...

In addition to the recommendations for Powered by the Apocalypse games (specifically Monster of the Week) I'd also encourage you to look into the FATE system, especially FATE: Accelerated Edition[0] and its SRD [1]. It's designed to be fairly light on the mechanics, and to help the GM and the players focus on the development of a story within those mechanics. I've been running a homebrew-story FAE game with a group of 4 friends and I really like the flexibility it gives us to focus on the narrative and character development. Also it's designed to be a pretty minimal time commitment to learn the rules well enough to give it a try.

[0] https://www.evilhat.com/home/fae/

[1] https://fate-srd.com/fate-accelerated/get-started

>> I would prefer to develop a story together. A system where you don’t need a exact map with squares/hexagons to make decisions, for example. Where story and character decisions on what to do matter more than tactical decisions in combats.

You're probably looking for something like the old Call of Cthulhu by Chaosium:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Call_of_Cthulhu_(role-playing_...

I see from the wikipedia article that the last edition was in 2014, so it's still going. There used to be a d20 version, also, for those people who don't know how to read two d10 side-by-side ;)

You might also want to check out the user forums at rpg.net:

https://forum.rpg.net/index.php

You can find threads for all sorts of games, more or less popular. You're bound to find something that you will like.

You can play any system any way, and popularity of D&D (especially online and in English-speaking countries) means that you're more likely to find the 5% of D&D players that want narrative-focused D&D than the 50% of World of Darkness or Call of Cthulhu players who want narrative-focused games. But there's enough of both to find someone on the internet.

Also systems come with setting and genre - if you like medieval fantasy and political intrigue Call of Cthulhu might not be for you (because it takes place in more modern times in real-world+ universe and it's mostly focused on horror/mystery). World of Darkness has a culture of focusing on narrative and acting over mechanics in this system, but it can be a little too "emo"/"existential horror" for some people. Or maybe it's my prejudice, I've never personally played it, just watched some games in the 90s.

If you don't like crunchy mechanics there's a very simple d6 system:

1 = you failed AND something bad happened

2 = you failed

3 = you failed BUT something good happened

4 = you succeeded BUT something bad happened

5 = you succeeded

6 = you succeeded AND something good happened

Your character sheet is just a table with free-form description of what you're good at (you roll 2d6 and choose better result) and what you're bad at (you roll 2d6 and choose worse result). DM can also give you more/less dices depending on how hard something is to do.

That's pretty much it - you can play it now :). I don't remember what was the name of that system but it's commonly played late-night at conventions - almost no setup required. And it tends to create games with little focus on combat.

Voice-acting is a matter of personal preference I think. I don't usually do it and I've never had problems in games where some people did it and some didn't.

Anyway - the key to having fun is to set expectations on the first session. Better to talk about it in advance than to waste time playing with people who want to have fun differently than you. The system is secondary (and you can always houserule stuff away if it's too complex for you).

Well to get to more story aspects - you really need to be at least conversant with the mechanical aspects and also the actual fluff so you don't keep breaking Suspension of disbelief for the players.