Why 4,998 died in U.S. jails before their day in court
reuters.com
reuters.com
I worked with these folks on the mental health side years ago and we avoided putting our people in King County Jail whenever at all possible for a lot of reasons. Support in the form of mental health professionals, other social workers, and basic training for the cops and corrections officers is severely lacking.
Some of my guys would be in and out of KCJ dozens of times for minor charges, which would interrupt what little treatment and stability they had, sometimes catastrophically. Between that and the ER visits they were probably costing the city and state tens of thousands a year. Considering how cheap housing was when we could find it and the incredibly powerful effect it had on their lives and outcomes, it felt like the system was robbing itself while making everyone worse off in the process. And Seattle is known for being a compassionate, responsive city for this stuff! How it must be in other places I can't even imagine.
More like robbing the taxpayers to pay you (assuming your agency was state funded), the guards, the food supplier, etc. etc.
Thousands of livelihoods are supported by crappy prisons and the war on drugs.
The jail system couldn't even keep the worlds number one criminal from being brutally murdered, with the guards sleeping and the tapes "not working" (Epstein)
If you are in California, we have a unique opportunity to eliminate cash bail this year by voting yes on Prop 25. I would highly recommend voting yes on Prop 25. Note that you can register to vote all the way up till November 3rd (we have same day registration here in California so you can register while voting).
I think more still needs to be done. Both police officers in the streets and officers guarding jails should be held accountable for their actions. Police brutality anywhere should be prosecuted.
Is this the bystander effect in the scale of an entire country? "Oh I'm waiting for someone else to start taking action first"
And then some people have the audacity to criticize people taking direct action while they're living in their single family homes, completely oblivious to what's happening to thousands of their country-people.
I'm disappointed in us.
If you aren't seeing protests, I invite you to simply start one one your own. If your politicians aren't reacting, visit a local one with your cell phone camera on and ask them if Black lives matter. I've been twisting the screws like this on some local shithead conservative politicians and it's honestly kinda fun to watch them squirm.
What % of Americans do you think know there is nearly daily protests happening in nearly every metro area? 10%? 20%?
Fyodor Dostoevsky
Start with prisoners, and you elevate everything. Instead, in the US we racistly fantasize about interracial sexual assaults, make people shit in front of each other, and make them work for 15 cents an hour. It's obvious what society has to look like outside of the walls.
And were not talking about prison here; this is jail. Everybody there is innocent. The state should keep them comfortable, and spend as much effort trying to come up with reasons why they are not guilty as reasons they are guilty. Instead, it's just pre-prison.
No, 5000 of them died in pre-trial detention. A lot more died in jail (which is a much larger set that includes most pretrial detention and a lot of other incarceration), and an even larger number died while incarcerated (an even larger set that is a superset of both of the previous ones.)
> Fyodor would call our jails health spas compared to what existed in Russia during his lifetime between 1821 and 1881.
I absolutely guarantee that Russia had an order of magnitude lower proportion of incarcerated people than the US. We have a higher percentage of people in prison than any other nation on earth, double our nearest competitor.
So, highest in the world but not anywhere nearly double the second highest, and not an order of magnitude greater than Russia.
Prison rape is treated as something to laugh about, not as unconscionable violence.
You've asserted that this eugenicist viewpoint is valid and is defensible but you don't present such a defense. Would you like to post a defense this position which is by no means obvious?
It's not eugenics though.
Many, me included, believe that for example one innocent execution is too many. But it's such a small percentage! But the existence of capital of punishment increases prosocial behavior! (it doesn't but besides the point)
Nah, ethics still matter.
For non-serious crimes we really shouldn't.
But "cashless bail" has downsides. People are more likely to just skip hearings. Or they keep committing minor crimes because they don't view themselves as facing consequences.
Police generally don’t have a lot of resources to track people down.
And.. staying with your cousin isn’t “taking flight” - it’s just being a fool.
It doesn’t take a criminal mastermind to evade the police. They don’t keep searching indefinitely.
A speedy trial might help with that. And it's a great idea in any event.
That's a good reason for not going simple OR (own recognizance), and may in cases where there is more personal information beyond just a serious crime be part of why particular suspects ought not be considered for bail of any kind, but not a good reason, in any case, for a jail or cash-bail binary choice.
> But "cashless bail" has downsides. People are more likely to just skip hearings.
D.C. uses a no-cash-bail system, and IIRC does not see this compared to either when they used cash bail or to other jurisdictions that do.
> Or they keep committing minor crimes because they don't view themselves as facing consequences.
Again, I don't think there's evidence that this is the case, but insofar as it is, it seems it would be a speedy trial problem. (And/or a reason certain suspects ought not to be eligible for bail of any kind.)
Well if you weren't detaining them... 'fleeing' wouldn't be a thing so they couldn't flee and problem solved.
As long as they turn up for their trial what's the problem?
If they don't, prosecute them for that as well.
So if you were making the laws, the trooper that pulled over Timothy McVeigh would have just given him a summons and told him to show up in court?
I agree that holding someone without a conviction looks like a violation of the presumption of innocence. This is why the right to a speedy trial is in the constitution, to minimize this violation. Unfortunately that right is somewhat theoretical. Depending on the crime, people spend on average between 50 and 200 days in jail before trial. This is way too long and we should really figure out how to streamline these processes for the cases where someone really does need to be held for trial.
Well, it's certainly not a real concern that is addressed by cash bail; if someone is inclined to flee prosecution for a major crime, a cash bail will either (a) be unaffordable, and thus equivalent to no bail, or (b) affordable and an acceptable cost to sacrifice when fleeing.
If you think about what people are fleeing if they are fleeing bail, it makes sense. Bail is essentially taking money. If someone can post a million dollars bail, but thinks they can evade the Justice system by fleeing, a million dollars probably isn't going to be worth a sizable risk of being imprisoned for whatever the potential sentence is for their crime.
OTOH, non-cash-bail systems tend to put more focus on monitoring and related conditions which have a real and meaningful impact on flight.
Well, we have this thing called civil forfeiture...
It lets you take somebody's money if you're a cop.
So let's say you're a cop in need of some money.
You can simply pull somebody over, among others things... and... take their money
Well, what would you do if somebody just took your money? You might want to tell on them, or at least get your money back.
Easiest way to not get told on with consequence if you stole somebody's money? Put them in jail with the powers vested in you...
There are a lot of reasons to do this. The real question is why the detention is designed to be punitive, and why can you pay to get out of it?
I want to know more about this. That's my data, as I am that for which the government exists. So who dares to withhold it from me? Have newspapers tried FOIA requests for it? This is the first I've heard of this data being withheld. Withheld by who?
Edit: wow holy shit it's worse than I thought:
> The Justice Department’s Bureau of Justice Statistics has collected inmate mortality data for two decades – but statistics for individual jails are withheld from the public, government officials and oversight agencies under a 1984 law limiting the release of BJS data. Agency officials say that discretion is critical because it encourages sheriffs and police to report their deaths data each year.
They don't want to let people read the reports because they're afraid cops won't report their murders otherwise. Despicable. Now I have more reasons than ever to continue protesting.
But don't worry, Reuters did their own data analysis:
Because the government won’t release jail-by-jail death data, Reuters compiled its own. The news organization tracked jail deaths over the dozen years from 2008 to 2019 to create the largest such database outside of the Justice Department. Reporters filed more than 1,500 records requests to obtain information about deaths in 523 U.S. jails – every jail with an average population of 750 or more inmates, and the 10 largest jails or jail systems in nearly every state. Together, those jails hold an average of some 450,000 inmates a day, or about three out of every five nationwide.
The results were predictable:
Reuters is making the full data it gathered available to the public.
One finding: Since the last Justice Department report, for 2016, the death rate in big jails has continued to climb, leaving it up 8% in 2019, the highest point in the 12-year period of 2008-2019 examined by Reuters. In that time, the suicide rate declined as many facilities launched suicide awareness and response initiatives. But the death rate from drug and alcohol overdoses rose about 72% amid the opioid epidemic.
So alcohol and opioid OD's accounted for most of the deaths. Not mishandling by the staff or as the first story in the article highlighted, an inmate who was beat to death by the prison guards.
Which begs the question, how are drug addicts ODing while they are being incarcerated? Don't they have resources to get these people help with their withdrawal and treatment??
If this is what we were doing, we wouldn't be arresting junkies for being junkies. This is a retroactive justification for cruelty.
Yes it is.
Out of curiosity, when you say things like "survival strategy for species," between which sentient species of human level complexity are you comparing? I'm only aware of one so I'm really surprised to find someone speaking so confidently on what works and doesn't work for the survival of sentient species.
Nothing you're saying makes me think any of this is ok lol.
I don't think such a distinction is made elsewhere (at least not in the UK).