Neutral is very much in the eye of the beholder. To start considering this scenario, we'd have to ask "Who will be the arbiter of whether a site's content is 'neutral?'"
I, for one, appreciate the current status quo where I generally don't have to deal with neo-Nazis spouting nonsense uncontested on my Facebook wall (and if that arrangement bothers me, I could go to some other site).
I'm happy to do so. I'm also happy the platform has some base-level standards so I don't have to block and contest quite so much.
> Social media companies lean left, the government should ensure they remain neutral by following the First Amendment.
Is there anything in particular about social media, as a technology, that causes all companies engaging in it to "lean left?" If not, this is a problem the market can solve.
What about more nuanced cases? Who will be arbiter of "neutral" then?
Doesn't matter if the government itself posted that article. Doxxing info is immoral and should be blocked.