Hacker News Reader

Comment by johnchristopher | Hacker News Reader

I was surprised to learn that https://www.engadget.com/dropbox-records-first-profit-ever-1... it's the first year Dropbox is profitable since going public.

View on HN

I find it funny that Dropbox is used as the example of HN nerds saying how they couldn't understand how something was a business because there are so many easy ways to implement it. If it never made money, it wasn't a business.

The original thread was shitting on the idea of an online storage solution. The idea was good, its just every other tech company jumped on the same boat and crushed drop box.

Was it? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9224

Yes. Stating that the product was useless due to FTP+SVN/USB drives was incorrect. The idea was a huge success. Dropbox just wasn't the one that got the reward.

My comment didn't say that the product was useless, and it certainly didn't shit on the idea of an online storage solution. In that thread, I was saying that I already had an online storage solution, and it was working pretty well for me. When I said the notorious "quite trivially" phrase, I was in fact predicting that it would be easy for every other tech company to jump on the same boat.

Regarding USBs, Dropbox's messaging at the time was "throw out your USB drives", and this was before smartphones or ubiquitous dependable network connections. At the time, if I had to give a presentation in a university classroom, Dropbox wasn't moving the bar much on that particular problem.

It's hilarious now you're backtracking and pretending that you weren't shitting on the idea but that other players would implement the same. Very clear that you were saying since someone could do it themselves why would they need a seperate app for it ,why else did you list it as qualms with the app?

Is your ego really that fragile that you can't admit you made a mistake judging a business?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com