Right now Gamestop and AMD are the stocks dujour:
https://topstonks.com/stocks/gme
https://topstonks.com/stocks/amd
Interestingly, the guys at wallstreetbets were recommending the VIX a few weeks ago right before the correction. It's been a fun thing to watch.
The problem with false information are the people who want to sell it as correct information for a variety of reasons.
I'm sure that I've posted some wrong things, but not disinformation. Nobody who is ever going to do anything with the information on that sub will ever rely on info posted there. The worst I've seen is some pseudo-news organization actually quoting a Reddit post on r/spacex without attribution. People who actually build rockets don't learn their craft from Reddit.
I also was confused at first.
Each subreddit is oriented around specific or a broad topic, a theme.
There is a subreddit for anything you can think of, some very niche subreddits are excellent sources of information.
Before seeing that I would have claimed basically any sincere strategy in good faith would be a winner right now. Clearly no, there's plenty of people who managed to burn through thousands in these conditions.
Really illustrates the difference between gambling and investing.
It's probably excellent advice to never look at WSB and regard it as 100% noise.
Randomly drawing letters out of a hat and buying those stocks would have produced dramatically better results.
Edit: i just bought a $100 or so of 4 stocks by randomly selecting letters until I got a match. Let's see how this strategy pans out. I bet it won't go to zero
Options have more degrees of freedom than stocks. Since they're derivatives, those degrees must ultimately collapse to the delta, i.e. to the stock's price movement, as the sole non-zero sum source of profit. As a result, there are more ways for professionals to monetize their edge.
Right, but there are also traders who have made 10x or more. Many have turned a few thousand into 5 or 6 figures. You have to find the right strategies and traders to follow. There are traders who demonstrate skill, by consistently making profits. This involves optimal position sizing and optimal call option duration and strike prices and other factors such as momentum.
With a large enough group consistently making profits would not necessarily be a demonstration of skill. Even if the returns were completely random several traders would constantly perform well above average.
In fact, I would argue that the most well-known posts are often from people losing huge amounts of money, eg. "Guh".
AAPL stock, from the release of the iPhone until now, has been an amazing investment.
Some amateur analysts would beat the professionals in predicting quarterly reports.
Then greed set in.
https://fortune.com/2013/03/04/the-rise-and-fall-of-andy-zak...
Just imagine if investors in his fund had just bought the stock instead of options (calls).
Similar situation as above.
Don't invest what you can't lose. Slow and steady and living below your means wins the race.
USA tax laws favor investment income over labor income. If no wage income, first $75k of qualified dividend income is federal tax free. Most qualified dividends pay 2-4% so you need $2 million dollars to get $6k post tax dollars a month.
Gist of the story is that an amateur law student was amazingly good at predicting AAPL earnings every quarter. Graduated, and started his own hedge fund.
Publicly advocated buying options because AAPL could only go up bc profits were increasing. That's also what he did with investors' money. Options expired worthless. All $$ lost.
AAPL price did not follow increase in earnings in straight line.
You may be interested in this 11 minute video of Ben Felix, of PWL Capital in Canada, entitled "US Elections vs. the Stock Market":
> With the upcoming United States presidential election, lots of investors are worried about how the election outcome will affect their investments. This is not a new worry - elections are stressful times and it seems obvious that the outcome should impact the stock market. Rhetoric from across the political spectrum certainly doesn’t help.
> Fortunately, the relationship between stock markets, elections, and political parties has been studied extensively, allowing us to step back from the rhetoric to consider the historical data and the theories that explain it.
* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYHu9PMY_C4
There some interesting apolitical (peer-reviewed) papers linked in the description. It's all about time-varying risk aversion.
(No connection/relationship, just a fan of his.)
I like the catch phrase, lol
Can I ask what tech stack you used?