Thankfully some law firms have taken the approach to overwhelm Arise with individual arbitration claims. Arise likely calculated in to their model as a cost of business expense, so the best that can be done is to make that expense grow.
Thankfully some law firms have taken the approach to overwhelm Arise with individual arbitration claims. Arise likely calculated in to their model as a cost of business expense, so the best that can be done is to make that expense grow.
If you feel strongly against arbitration clauses, activism to get people to use them is the fastest way to kill them as the cost benefit will quickly become a negative.
https://www.theverge.com/2020/2/12/21135474/doordash-workers...
Ok not really almost, but for a brief second.
In the meantime create a tool to allow for mass arbitration actions.
Or forbid it entirely.
What exactly is the problem with writing a law to stop an abusive practice?
I see mandatory arbitration as a trade-off, and would simply prefer that people take that kind of clause into account when they transact with others.
The root cause is the demand for that type of labor is dwarfed by supply for type of labor, and the long lasting solution would be to provide those people with better options.
Plus again scale shifts profits away from labor: https://economics.mit.edu/files/12979