Hacker News Reader

Comment by recursive | Hacker News Reader

Do what? I would have been surprised if this wasn't the case. Websites see every keystroke you make while their targeted. People should realize that. If they don't, they're in for some rude surprises.

View on HN

The browsers could buffer the text in text fields until the field loses focus (clicked another field or submit) or hit enter. It would break search-as-you-type functionality, but not the biggest loss in the world.

devs would just catch keyboard events and simulate text fields you're not getting this one back in pandora's box

There's always the option of typing your stuff in another program entirely and copy/pasting. Sure, not everyone would be willing to do that, but it's really not that inconvenient if you know your keyboard shortcuts (ctrl+a, ctrl+c, alt+tab, ctrl+v in that order, easy for a competent computer user). And socially anxious people may be more comfortable with that overall.

Copy+paste won't trigger keyboard events to my knowledge. So if the page was just simulating a text input field, paste wouldn't work. (Which would cause issues e.g. pasting account numbers to be fair.)

There are quite a few browser extensions that make this easier. The best is Pentadactyl, a complete UI overhaul for vi bindings everywhere that lets you hit Control + i to open any text field in any (blocking) external editor (gvim -f by default), so you can type out your message and then type ZZ to send all the text to the field at once. However, it’s only for XUL browsers. I think there are also WebExtensions that offer similar external editor support, but when I use browsers limited to them I use wasavi, which pops up a javascript-powered vi clone inside the browser (but still only sends the text down to the area when you save). IIRC SurfingKeys also has a similar thing, with a codemirror-based editor that’s IME more limited than wasavi. Of course none of these work on exceptionally complicated things like Google Docs, but they often work on simpler WYSIWYG rich text areas, and wasavi and maybe SurfingKeys even support converting the HTML within them to Markdown while editing, and back when you save.

How about disabling all network actions until user hits send button. I know very complicated to implement.

receiving raw keyboard events should require special permissisions then like audio and video.

Maybe we can achieve that when we create the next internet.

Browsers already have good UX reasons to do something like this. They should offer version history on textareas, for example, so you don't need to ever worry about losing state.

But they don't. So I build it (draft system) for my users by saving what they type as they type it, and they are very thankful.

If you would kill my ability to build that feature, then you better replace it with a solution.

For a site being creepy that way it's usually shoved into a database somewhere. Not shown to a human.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com