I'm curious about your phrasing, however. In your view, is a middle class approach to life a life that simply conforms to the predictions of mimetic theory without awareness, or a life informed by its understanding and application?
Note that in this century, the mimetic middle class is much closer to the statistical middle class (the modal hump of the poisson distribution) than to the more historical middle class (those with enough property to weather a few years not working, but not enough for permanent leisure. Go back another century and one has the classes of Jane Austen, who wrote mostly about the upper middle, with a smattering of lower upper characters.)
Sili to deng fo decho da nagut, deng to mebi mowsh shetexa kori milowda, kowmang.
Edit: also, conspiracy theorists may enjoy the double-scapegoating in the Passion, as told in Master and Margarita.