All that it implies is that previously they were not being transparent about the numbers and now they are finally being forthcoming.
> they were not being transparent about the numbers and now they are finally being forthcoming.
and that's the case?
Why are you asking questions to some random person on the internet? Do you know something you're not sharing? I was just trying to be helpful and relay an answer to your question that I gleaned from the article itself. I have no special access to any information.
I was demonstrating the nature of the journalism which tries to implicitly install suspicion from the headline to forward an agenda