This must be today's "most HN" comment.
- Dismisses a new project that simplifies a task and makes it more approachable to non-technical folks (Like the famous Dropbox comment [0])
- Is extremely pedantic and serves only as a distraction from a discussion
- Argues in favor of pure functional programming
- Misses obvious sarcasm, even when the /s is included.
- tries to come up with an overly precise technical definition of something entirely subjective and unserious.
;-)
There's always someone that's religious about their particular technical choices.
* dismisses the thought by referring to the commenter's privilege for having it in the first place, rather than commenting on the value or feasibility of the thought itself.
Can you think of any other community where someone can discuss the damage of a CRT monitor falling into your face with terms like "scale linearly" and everybody just nods in agreement?
I think it's delightful, one of the little pleasures of hanging around here.
And some of the later generation CRTs breached 20" and were a good 30+kg.
Sony's 24" GDM-FW900 was a pretty incredible 42kg.
Then for ultimate convenience (laziness) I connected a bluetooth presentation clicker to my iPad to turn the pages for me so I didn't have to keep reaching up or take my arms out from under the blanket on cold nights. In two years it's never dropped.
Is there a way to use the clicker with the kindle?
I keep thinking of assembling about the same thing, but missed the warm-blanket factor. Now I definitely must do it.
I use them for reading in bed, although sites do everything in their power to make landscape mode on mobile phones unusable.
I have a standing desk that earns me a closed cyan ring every day.
Cool project, but would not be one that I would use.
Is this referring to some tracking software?