Hacker News Reader

Comment by jamroom | Hacker News Reader

I'm not much of an economic expert nor do I really know how the airline industry operates, so I could be completely wrong.

My concern with an "airlines bailout" is that it is just going to prop up the industry for another quarter or two, when I don't believe that demand for air travel will return to pre-pandemic levels any time soon. So what if instead, we just allow the airlines to lay off tens of thousands of people and the money we would have spent bailing out the business side + workers just goes to the workers instead? It could even include job training or something else to help those that want to change industries. Then as demand returns many of these laid off workers can be rehired.

I don't know if this would work, but I feel like if we talking about propping up all the airlines then it's something we will be doing for several years.

View on HN

You're absolutely right, that would be the better approach, but it is unlikely to succeed with the current Congress. A rational Congress would have recognized months ago that the economic effects of the pandemic are likely to persist for years, and that bailing out businesses is not going to solve this problem at all... But the Republicans are not willing to admit yet that this is going to be a problem past next summer.

Are you saying the Republicans want bigger bailouts? The last o checked they're keeping us from wasting 3 trillion more.

Only after passing a multi trillion tax cut and trillions in initial stimulus of which very little helped individual workers.

I agree both parties are completely incompetent and want to spend like crazy.

you don't need to be an expert to know that you're exactly correct, all you need to do is look at how the airlines behaved when they got bailed out last time.

> So what if instead, we just allow the airlines to lay off tens of thousands of people and the money we would have spent bailing out the business side + workers just goes to the workers instead? It could even include job training or something else to help those that want to change industries.

This. Let the airlines go bankrupt but help the workers directly. If demand does come back some savvy entrepreneurs will be able to pick up the airline assets for a cheap price and get them back into business again in a few years.

>it is just going to prop up the industry for another quarter or two, when I don't believe that demand for air travel will return to pre-pandemic levels any time soon

This is 100% correct. Even if a vaccine were to be approved by the end of this year, it will take until mid/late next year before most of the developed world has received it. In the meantime, companies continue to find new ways of working remotely (I'm a tech consultant and have spent most of the last 20 years flying every week on Monday and back on Thursday, haven't flown since mid March). Extending the CARES Act airline bailout for another 3-6 months is not going to solve the problem, and continuously extending it for another 12+ months is not viable and a complete waste of money. The government should be figuring out other ways of redirecting resources idled by the pandemic, not propping up zombie companies forever.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com