I'm guessing it's less the quality of the code they produce and more the quantity. Their rockstar programmers can work 10x more efficiently than other programmers, thus the CEO can hire 10x fewer programmers.
I'm guessing it's less the quality of the code they produce and more the quantity. Their rockstar programmers can work 10x more efficiently than other programmers, thus the CEO can hire 10x fewer programmers.
How does that even work? The fastest system RAM you can get that I know of is DDR4-5000, which transfers at 40 GB/s (320 Gb/s). How can you encrypt and send data faster than your memory can even transfer it to the CPU? Or is there something I'm misunderstanding?
https://variety.com/2020/digital/news/netflix-degrading-hd-v...
Even if they are bandwidth constrained, I wouldn't be surprised if some shows looked better at 480i/.5Mbps than 1080p/.5Mbps.
So instead of paying $260k per year for 10 engineers (2.6M), they might pay 451k for 3 "10x" engineers (1.3M). Costs are 50% lower overall, and if the engineers are even 2x more productive than the average you "break even".
Smaller staff means you need fewer managers.
I'm not saying this is actually how it works in real life (can a developer really be 10x more productive? who know). This is just their operating theory.
Source: https://www.levels.fyi/?compare=Netflix,Google,Facebook,Micr...