If you're not doing native development on Windows 'cause you want cross-platform support, you won't use DirectX specific pieces...
Wouldn't developers just write native Windows ML apps then?
The DirectX integration is going to bring over that support to Windows.
https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/announcing-cuda-on-windows...
https://devblogs.microsoft.com/directx/wp-content/uploads/si...
From https://devblogs.microsoft.com/directx/directx-heart-linux/
I'm not even sure where mesa comes in. Can you elaborate where you got your info?
It makes zero sense to consume D3D12 and DirectML under WSL directly from user applications since that prevents your app from being deployed on the real linux. There also won't be any SDK or headers released by Microsoft so you'll have to manually load functions from .so.
> It makes zero sense to consume D3D12 and DirectML under WSL directly from user applications since that prevents your app from being deployed on the real linux.
That's the whole point, people will do it because it's convenient, and Microsoft is counting on the fact that it prevents your app from being deployed on "real Linux". DirectX is already quite a popular API on a popular OS and actually pretty good on technical merit alone. It may very well be a sensible trade-off for a project or developer to move to DirectX, but it will be a loss for the Linux ecosystem.
> There also won't be any SDK or headers released by Microsoft so you'll have to manually load functions from .so.
The .so files are compiled from the same source code, the article doesn't go into a lot of detail but I suspect existing DirectX tooling will be updated for Linux targets. Either way, normal developers will have access to the same tooling and documentation as the developers for TensorFlow and similar ML frameworks you already claimed will talk to D3D12 or DirectML (unless you're claiming that Microsoft will give special tools to the open source TensorFlow project or something).