- Vehicle safety
- Smoking
- Asbestos
- Lead
All of this stuff only got limited when it killed many people and even then a lot of proof was necessary to convince countries to do something.
I am however very pessimistic about our (as a species) ability to deal with something that's even more long-term than i.e. CFCs or SO2.
> The findings suggest that China, which was thought to be the source of most of the rogue emissions of the chemical, CFC-11, has made strides in clamping down on illegal production of the gas. CFC-11 is used to make insulating foams.
-- https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/04/climate/china-cfcs.html
What happened was that the rate of decline of CFC concentration slowed down[1] after 2012. This was an indication that there were new emitters. China then found the emitters and shut them down. [2]
[1] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-018-0106-2.epdf
[2] https://nationalpost.com/news/world/china-makes-arrests-shut...
Note that the actual implementation often lags behind the policy goals by quite a bit.
EU is on track (past 10 years and future 10 years) of reducing emissions by about 10% per decade. India is on track of increasing emissions by about 50% per decade. Yes EU is classified as "insufficient" and India as "2 degrees compatible". I guess that has to do with India's emissions being smaller in absolute terms at the moment, even though they are on an increasing track.
https://climateactiontracker.org/countries/eu/ https://climateactiontracker.org/countries/india/
Compare that to what they've been doing since 2000.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_carbon_di...