By relying on rsync.net's automated ZFS snapshots I get the same or similar protection compared to Tarsnaps's write-only keys.
For my personal use case cost wasn't an issue, though. It's less than 10 GB of data stored.
By relying on rsync.net's automated ZFS snapshots I get the same or similar protection compared to Tarsnaps's write-only keys.
For my personal use case cost wasn't an issue, though. It's less than 10 GB of data stored.
It wasn't about price for me either. On the few occasions I actually had to restore some files, Tarsnap was glacially slow. That made me nervous if I ever hit a situation where I had to do a full restore.
Like you say, there's the quality-of-life features that I now don't have to script. Pruning, missed backup alerts, monthly reports are all things I've realized were sorely missing from my Tarsnap experience.
I don't know the architecture of Borg storage too closely, but I assume that since it is all end-to-end encrypted, Borgbase cannot do the pruning for you.
If you use append-only keys, they can't (destructively) prune, you have to use regular keys to do that.