And for the price of a small 2-bedroom apartment in the SF-area, you can pretty much buy a mansion where I live.
Then you have things like healthcare, school costs, daycare / cost of raising a child, etc. etc.
And for the price of a small 2-bedroom apartment in the SF-area, you can pretty much buy a mansion where I live.
Then you have things like healthcare, school costs, daycare / cost of raising a child, etc. etc.
edit: Two engineers together can make $700k+ which is $450+k after taxes per year. After one year and reasonable spending that's enough for a down payment on a house in the Bay Area. Every single year you get enough to pay for 1.5 kid's worth of college education at a top private school. Very few costs actually matter in comparison at that point.
edit: This is as someone who has experienced household lifestyles going from <$40k/year to >$250k/year.
I've gone from 0K to 200K in my life and more money is always better, it's more freedom and it's more happiness and there has never been any downside.
Making more money has always made me happier and it's given me the ability to take care of the people I care about.
I want more and if a job comes up tomorrow that will pay me more, I'm there.
Tere's diminishing returns on wealth accumulation. You need to give up something to make that extra more. Different people have different thresholds for "giving up" certain aspects of their life.
However, the housing stock is mostly old & run down even at two million dollar prices. Not to mention, a kid with two full time Googler parents? They are attending an academically rigorous private school with 3-4 hours of cram classes after, not sipping virgin daiquiris by the pool.
The life you can't imagine are all the lucky Engineers to be paid bay area salaries at reasonable cost of living locations like Seattle. You may laugh at me calling Seattle "reasonable" but compared to the bay it is.
I don't see why not. It's not like the Bay Area is particularly great culturally, culinarily or in most other ways. It's a giant suburb sandwiched between a medium sized city and a place that is only technically dense enough to be a city. There's plenty of mid-sized cities and suburbs in the US with reasonable costs of living.
In terms of diverse activities I've personally found east coast cities better and most have broader suburbs than the bay area (due to not being restricted by mountains) so it's easier to trade commute against price.
Cost of living sucks, it’s why I just moved to a better COL area but damn do I miss the restaurant scene.
It’s not hard to save a million or more on those salaries before you turn 30. That’s a lot of freedom.