Hacker News Reader

Comment by matz1 | Hacker News Reader

Its highly possible that the anxiety and stress would cause you more trouble then the virus itself.

Then again, I had flu/cold before that is mild but feel horrible as I experienced it.

Yeah, I'd say 90% of the issue(for me, not my wife, she actually was too sick to leave bed and had a todler to look after) was the stress and anxiety.

But am I alone in this?

I don't think so, I think most people would go through the same stress and anxiety in my situation, that is the part that is so easy to overlook.

You are not alone, I too had some anxiety in beginning of march but over time, as more data and fact come out, now I have almost zero stress and anxiety due to covid. Now my stress and anxiety is largely from the people/government response of the covid.

Source? This is a virus killing a ton of people and leaving many more flat on their backs for weeks... To suggest that it's "highly possible" someone's symptoms are from anxiety is kind of insulting IMO.

>killing a ton of people

its not.

current best estimate of ifr according to cdc :

0-19 years: 0.00003

20-49 years: 0.0002

50-69 years: 0.005

70+ years: 0.054

Percent of infections that are asymptomatic: 40%

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/planning-scena...

Which is a good news that so many the cases are asymptomatic and the ifr is so low.

Which is also inline with my own observation, I know almost nobody get really sick from covid.

I still go out whenever I can, still travel whenever I can, still doing normal socialization/gathering as I possibly still can.

That is a lot of people. 200,000 deaths already attributed to COVID-19 in the USA. That's 0.0006 of the entire population dead already. Is it good that it's not that contagious? Yes. Is it killing a lot of people? Also yes.

All-causes mortality is up quite a bit too.

This is the part where it become very subjective. I disagree that its a lot, to me is not a lot.

Though i could understand that for some people even 1 death is a lot.

How much is a lot for you? A million? Two? At what level will you admit that you're just plain wrong about all this? Or is it all fine as long as you get through in one piece?

Wrong about what? It is a fact that vast majority of cases are asymptomatic or only have mild symptoms.

What about million people suffering due to lockdown? To you they should just endure it right?

How about you, how much low is low to you ? 0 death ? 1 death ?

How much is lockdown suffering is acceptable to you ?

So, no answer then. Ok.

It's hard to define "a lot" for 2 reasons:

1. The human population is very large so even the smallest fraction is a sensational number.

2. Any death is a tragedy for someone, not the least the person who died.

This creates a situation where you have lots of people talking past each other.

Maybe it's easier to understand as a rate. Around the beginning of May, the all-causes mortality rate in the USA was about 50% higher than normal. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02497-w

It sure sounds like a lot but historically its not, not yet anyway.

This is a graph of historical deaths in Sweden which has a similar death rate as the US. https://twitter.com/PanData19/status/1297919439212552193/pho...

While this year isn't over yet there has been years in my life time with worse death rates that went by completely unnoticed. Looking back in a couple of years I don't think people are gonna say that a lot of people died this year.

You really should take that message at the end of the post to heart. It is directly addressed to you and those like you.

Likewise my comments are directly addressed to you and people like you too.

The thing is decision to lockdown is not just affect you, it affect other people too.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com