I just realized I have been running 99% fraud sites
reddit.com
reddit.com
Google seems to ban so many sites, yet what seem like obvious frauds make it though. There are forums full of black hat tactics and adfraud services for sale, yet rather than doing a few “buy/busts” to go straight to source of this stuff, they seem to focus on the publishers, and ban them for all manner of reasons often beyond their control.
I mean, I can buy that traffic to any site, I don’t need to own it. And then they bare the punishment.
And we could all just shrug and say “who cares”. But those ads support content on the web (more, it did). If google had more effectively banned the bad players and spam tactics, we wouldn’t have the level of SEO spam, low budget, useless content we see today. We’d still have the independent bloggers, making a decent wage, writing good content. But they can’t compete, because spam is more effective, and if they get banned they can just spin up another 10 sites.
But if you play by the rules, you’re the real loser.
Are we witnessing the greatest fraud in history?
we probably are
*
one other thing people should keep an eye on
Google inserting Adsense tags into organic traffic
people who were coming to your site anyways - Google pretending it's paid Adwords traffic
They create a crappy site with blog spam.
Pay someone else to get people to visit.
Then the people who have been directed to the site by someone else click on their ads, which = $
But they just found out the people who visit are really bots.
But currently everyone is getting paid. So the only loser is the advertisers at this stage.
------------------
> 8M * $0.80 CPM = $6400 revenue
> 8M * $0.25 CPM = $2000 expenses
> Profit = $4400?
> i_am_rich_AF : yes this is per site per month
In the short run yes. In the long run the cost per ad view/click drops and legitimate sites suffer from reduced ad revenue.