Hacker News Reader

Comment by just-juan-post | Hacker News Reader

Do you feel we should restrict billions from gathering with and hugging their family so that we can save 105 children?

Can you help us understand the thinking you use to make that tradeoff?

The point of the 105 dead children was to show children can be severely affected and don't have magic immunity. 500K children have been diagnosed with COVID, with varying symptom levels. We have 200,000 dead overall in the USA, so it's not just a matter of 105 dead children justifying lockdown, it's all those other dead people you seem to have forgotten about.

Also FYI, you can't hug your family member anymore once they're dead.

What’s the median age of those that have sadly passed and the percentage with comorbidities?

Do you really mean "sadly" when trying to make the point that old people or people with pre-existing conditions are acceptable deaths?

He is Just Asking Questions

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Just_asking_questions

Am I. Which part of the question is leading? Which part is not Socratic?

Well that would be an extremely unpleasant attempt at putting words in somebody's mouth that makes me wonder whether you are actually engaging honestly here.

Did you honestly not know the answer? What was your point?

They don't, but they are far more susceptible to Measles. In 2018 140,000 children died from measles -- a disease we actually have a well known vaccine that's been proven safe!

Well we've yet to develop a COVID-19 vaccine that ditzy parents can ignore/avoid. Stupidity isn't an excuse for more stupidity.

This is emotional manipulation that we can all engage in. The 105 children are not the only victims.

I have bad asthma and my wife is ill I don't appreciate you gathering and hugging your family and killing mine.

Did that advance the discussion? Was it manipulation? No and you bet!

Reply on news.ycombinator.com