Coffee Rust
theatlantic.com
theatlantic.com
Particularly watery looking for a cold brew
Website design and marketing aren't my area of expertise, but I think they'll lose a lot of eyeballs by advertising a product and don't either tell people where to buy it or if the product isn't released yet. Right now the website looks like an elaborate prank or a fake product. It would be fine if gathering interest/customers weren't the point of the website, but if it were about gaining investors then I think it should have other information (cost of production, scalability, market size, etc.).
It's a lot like synthetic wine. It's possible to analyze wine with a gas chromatograph to a level of detail that allows duplication. That's what "Gemello" is.[3] That's available now.
The coffee business has an advantage. Synthetic wine can't be sold as "wine" in the US. But synthetic coffee can be sold as coffee.
[1] https://news.yahoo.com/atomo-raises-9-million-bring-12000012...
[2] https://www.cnbc.com/2019/11/16/atomo-a-seattle-start-up-is-...
[3] https://www.sfchronicle.com/wine/article/San-Francisco-start...
Wine still has the wine snob thing going for it. Plus regulation that prevents calling synthetic wine "wine". Coffee, though - that's vulnerable to replacement.
[1] https://www.cnbc.com/2019/11/13/5-charts-that-show-how-milk-...
I did not know that I would see the vision of Miyazaki expressed in Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind realized in my lifetime.
I can't jibe these numbers. That's only $1,500 per farmer.
It's a shame, really, because Ethiopian coffee is absolutely wonderful.
(Google has become worse for long tail search queries, but interestingly now has an 'answer box' for wide ranging questions like this one.)
How coffee is prepared generally has a much greater impact on flavor than the varietal - when very lightly roasted it has a flavor profile closer to a tea than what we generally think of as coffee.
Most people are unfamiliar with existing diversity of coffees from around the world. A lot of that is due to the economics of the coffee industry and the desire for consistency in flavor. Sure, maybe we could add more genetic diversity, but it's unlikely to change how the coffee you'd buy at the supermarket or a cafe chain will taste.
Time to recalibrate the language confirmation bias and reset the adrenaline in you when your favourite language reaches top of Hacker News.
Unaffordable coffee is essentially equivalent to no coffee for 98% of the population.
One of the foundations of most farming is that given a large are, you can just place the plants and care for the ground they're on, and handle pests that can be seen. That's manageable with lots of farm labor and with available building material. Building a glass louvre around every rural farm between the tropics of cancer and capricorn, replacing the wind and rain, etc is just not how rural third world farming works.
If coffee, globally, needed to be grown in greenhouses it would just become a novelty tree that school trips visited until the climate turned around and it became an economically viable crop again.
Check out this video to get a sense of what goes into producing the beans we all consume. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BCCILcuWChM
Not sure if duckspeak =.= or duckspeak.
Edit for sauce: http://www.george-orwell.org/1984/4.html
Chicory coffee remains popular in New Orleans, but they usually blend in actual coffee for the caffeine kick: https://www.neworleansroast.com/chicory/
I'm joking, I did not do that, but it's possible explanation how this link got to the first page of HN.