Or, once again, is it just an amazing coincidence that people have suddenly completely flipped their stance because it happened in California?
Please quote back to me where in my post I say "more regulation".
> Aren't you "regulations" people usually against regulations?
??? Who is the "you" that is being referenced?
Perhaps you are projecting onto me positions that I have not stated and may not actually hold. I have not stated whether more free market is good/better or bad/worse, or whether more regulations would be better or worse.
I'm simply pointing out that, in addition to PG&E, there may be other parties that may share responsibility in the chain of events that led to the situation at hand.
PG&E operates in a regulatory context: is it worth examining if that context contributed to the current situation that California is in? Are the regulations a problem? Or how they are interpreted or applied? Are more needed, or less? Perhaps they need to be streamlined (proscriptive versus descriptive)? I have no answers to these questions.
See also: the FAA and Boeing (737 MAX).