>but it's understandable why the UK might choose not to treat them as a privileged observer.
Sounds more like a justifiable way of minimizing the legal support available to the defendant, and control the flow of information to the public.
Sounds more like a justifiable way of minimizing the legal support available to the defendant, and control the flow of information to the public.
Not to say that it wouldn't be a good idea for AI to have the privilege of oversight of any court proceeding in the UK. But I believe such a thing would have to start as law from the Houses, not the discretion of an individual judge. If there is precedent to the contrary, I will stand corrected.
I guess it's too much to ask of the UK though.
Just like the Internet Watch Foundation. Being a private charity does not mean much for the UK.