Gen Zers Say Silicon Valley Is Elitist/Exclusive. Can They Build a New System?
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
> Anyone over the age of 24 is placed into a group called Daddy Gang and limited to only a few channels.
I support these kids 100% but this gave me a good chuckle.
I'm all for young people getting into hacking, but this seems at best useless, at worst harmful.
(I say that as someone who has personally struggled with mental health and also has affected family members.)
I think it's very possible that a virtual therapist could be helpful, but it could also be harmful. In the same way that fiction affects our real emotions despite our knowledge that it isn't real, a virtual counselor that projects sympathy could give someone a real feeling of relief. The trouble comes from the nature of machine learning: unpredictability. What if your virtual therapist has a bug one day and starts telling you to kill yourself?
They all seem to agree that the consequences to people who don't agree with their vision should be severe.
This would certainly not conform to most previous definitions of inclusivity.
Nothing in here is about inclusivity. It's a power trip and a social status game on the internet.
It's well and good to dream about being unelitist, but the all of the consumers want the best possible product. Since they're going to choose the best, this choosiness flows downhill to the companies which must reward the best developers.
If Taylor and her TikTok gang want to be total okay with average products, well, we can get by with average coders.
Long Tran, 17, built a tool to help protect people from harassment on Twitter
I mean this at least gives me some hope that there's awareness within GenZ about the negative dynamics of social media.