A good question indeed?
A good question indeed?
Eco wash liquids are not as effective, so you end up sometimes washing twice (what's eco about that?).
Washable diapers are much less absorbent compared to regular ones, so its not an option for us for night - baby skin would be highly irritated the next morning. Same goes for more liquid poop - it would overflow very easily. And so on.
If you are en eco fanatic, then you can go that way, but in our case it would mean actively hurting our baby.
There are lot of wrong with diapers e.g. rash etc.
Google split-pants, elimination communication!
Claiming the moral high ground should presume posession of moral basics like decency (cutting people some slack, benefit of the doubt). Even more so if the moral high ground is used to shame others pulicly or subjugate to dishonorable treatment.
If not, all the moral grandstanding is just an excuse to behave like a douche.
Thus: people who are annoyed by this leave, with the share of those who think such behavior is ok ever increases
About reusable diapers: To satisfy ethical demands in an environment without decency is never achievable. Reusable diapers? Out of what material are they made? I hope it's environmentally substainable? Were they socially responsibly sourced? Done by a company or coop? Imported from a far away overseas country or produced by your local commune? It. Never. Stops.
1) No diapers, no resources used.
2) There are cultures who just don’t use them, why so imperialistic?
3) Isn’t your disgust of the smell of old diapers just a social construct?
How dare you grow non-native plants in your german backyard ! This is both a remnant of colonialism AND a danger to local biodiversity.
How many people can find, and understand, the information about CO2 use across the total life of disposable nappies Vs cotton nappies?
EDIT: here's an example analysis. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/...
It's 37 pages of detailed information that looks at the total life-cycle.
> The average 2006 disposable nappy would result in a global warming impact of approximately 550kg of carbon dioxide equivalents used over the two and a half years a child is typically in nappies. The global warming impact from disposable nappies use has decreased since the previous study due to manufacturing changes and a 13.5 per cent reduction in the weight of nappies.
> The report highlights that the manufacture of disposable nappies has greater environmental impact in the UK than their waste management by landfill.
> For reusable nappies, the baseline scenario based on average washer and drier use produced a global warming impact of approximately 570kg of carbon dioxide equivalents. However, the study showed that the impacts for reusable nappies are highly dependent on the way they are laundered.
> Washing the nappies in fuller loads or line-drying them outdoors all the time (ignoring UK climatic conditions for the purposes of illustration) was found to reduce this figure by 16 per cent. Combining three of the beneficial scenarios (washing nappies in a fuller load, outdoor line drying all of the time, and reusing nappies on a second child) would lower the global warming impact by 40 per cent from the baseline scenario, or some 200kg of carbon dioxide equivalents over the two and a half years, equal to driving a car approximately 1,000 km.
> In contrast, the study indicated that if a consumer tumble-dried all their reusable nappies, it would produce a global warming impact 43 per cent higher than the baseline scenario. Similarly, washing nappies at 90°C instead of at 60°C would increase global warming impact by 31 per cent over the baseline. Combining these two energy intensive scenarios would increase the global warming impact by 75 per cent over the baseline scenario, or some 420kg of carbon dioxide equivalent over the two and a half years.
> The environmental impacts of using shaped reusable nappies can be higher or lower than using disposables, depending on how they are laundered. The report shows that, in contrast to the use of disposable nappies, it is consumers’ behaviour after purchase that determines most of the impacts from reusable nappies.
> Cloth nappy users can reduce their environmental impacts by:
• Line drying outside whenever possible.
• Tumble drying as little as possible.
• When replacing appliances, choosing more energy efficient appliances (A+ rated machines are preferred).
• Not washing above 60°C.
• Washing fuller loads.
• Reusing nappies on other children.
It's not a simple calculation.Real nappies are better for baby and toddler bums, easier for already stressed parents and more hygienic.
Reusables result in massive energy and water waste, they are a health hazard if not washed properly (many manufacturers washing instructions are very inadequate. They must be washed at a minimum of 60°C whatever your manufacturer said), release loads of microplastics and are a lot more work.
As they don't huddle in caves without tools, the Amish use lots of technology.
They actually use fair amounts of modern technology, it's just that the things they reject are pretty central to modern mainstream lifestyle.
The argument for and against reusable is pretty much undecided. There also services which do the washing for you. And they are probably way more efficient than people washing at home in terms of energy used.
Anyhow, real eco-parents go diaper-less as most parents in the world. Google split-pants, elimination communication! Compared to this letting children sitting in their own feces in reusable or not-reusable nappies is pretty unhygienic.
Downvotes? I know it is a big leap for the western mind, that most human ever lived have never seen a nappy. There is a lot of problems with diapers e.g. rash etc.
It’s not all that big a leap either, there are plenty of gifs of Chinese parents utilizing split-pants to great effect.
So why is this not a problem to the Chinese but you make sound like one?
It evidently is a problem though considering the entire Chinese middle class seem to have switched en masse to disposables, turning China into the largest diaper market in the world over the past decade or so.
Because shit on the floor is also not really hygienic.
... and I know the technic and I know it requires more time. And the people I know applying it .. were only partly succesfull. With the result of shit around. And pee.
About accidents: And then what is more unhygienic?
Feces, urine on the floor or feces, urine all around your bottom? For the first you can use almost any cleaning liquid you want, for the second even to much soap is not good.
But peeing he just do without warning. I would have to pay attention to him 100% the whole time - and this is not what I want or can afford.
How is this post allowed to stand? How do I flag it?
Do people use synthetic reusable diapers? Why would you do that?
I'm not speaking in the abstract. We tried reusables.