> At some point, I may start my own private practice, where I’m my own boss and where I can focus on medication management – and not the kinds of psychotherapy that I’m most worried are ethically incompatible with being a public figure
It seems believable to me that "medication management" (you've been diagnosed with a mental illness, we have an idea how to treat this chemically, but it's a really complex balance that needs constant professional intervention) is less sensitive to being a public figure than other aspects of psychiatry (lie on the couch and open up to me with your personal secrets).
I'm sure this is a ridiculous simplification and as I said in another post here I'd like to hear SSC's take on it (but don't expect to). But it's uncharitable to say "something doesn't add up".
I think this really is the issue here with his employer, and I honestly always found it extremely weird, maybe unethical that he wants to avoid his patients figuring out that their stories may appear on a public blog.
Do you happen to know of any examples of articles he published along those lines? Now I’m curious what he said...
here's one, I don't know if he put that preface on all of them, apparently he fictionalises them and mixes them up.
I think your theory is spot on.
> The maxim is “do what lets you sleep at night”, so I punted. I kept him on his medications and turned him over to the next guy. I just hope the next guy gets my documentation instead of thinking “Dr. Alexander kept him on all this medication…I wonder what he knows that I don’t.”
Oh man, I have noticed this same behaviour with doctors.
I think how we portray doctors and hospitals as isn't aligned with practice. People really lack the skills to express their issues succinctly to doctors and expect them to figure out everything when they couldn't in months or years. The idea that a 30 min conversation is enough for doctors to know your entire life and medical history to prescribe you relevant medicine and diagnosis is flawed. Many people omit details out of fear and shame. Not that doctors are better at communicating that as a message. It's really like an interview.
Um, yes, burying your emotions is unhealthy! I'm surprised to see this coming from anyone in the realm of mental health. It is much more surprising coming from a supposed mental health professional who created a decently sized discussion forum via his blog. He continues,
> My relationship strategy is the same. Date really low-conflict, low-drama, agreeable people. If we have a conflict anyway, then agree to disagree and wait for the problem to go away. Apparently this is terrible
Yes... Yes it is. When you are motivated to be your best and you still fail, such as when people have kids, you realize you're better off dealing with your emotions rather than ignoring them. Some people realize this earlier than others. I hope the number of people practicing in mental health while maintaining this blogger's attitude is small.
I always figured people's chemical imbalances were influenced by behavior. If you just treat the chemical imbalance without addressing the behavior, isn't that rather risky?
Either way, pharmacotherapy is rarely administered alone, usually psychotherapists refer patients to psychiatrists if they believe pharmacotherapy can be beneficial, and with patient's consent they can share notes. He will be that therapist.
I see, thank you for your reply.
All the "behavioral" problems I may have had were largely caused by the underlying imbalance and just stopped once I was on it. Or at least, stopped enough that they are no longer a problem for me, and I think really once a behavior isn't causing issues in your life it is probably hard to classify it as a "problem"