Can you please explain?
It doesn't want to handle the money when you rent a hooker.
Unless, of course, you throw a gangbang, and Apple ends up eating 30% of the price of admission. Imagine the headline!
Imagine how much more fun life would be if vices were more accessible
Apple is one of the few that has different standards. And some of its consumers appreciate that. There's room in the market for both views.
Especially payment processors, which cause serious bottlenecks in the ability of people to pay for services online.
Apple seems to be in the majority from where I look.
Everybody wants to be "family friendly", which means no sexy stuff. Violence? Sure. Guns? Sure. Sex? Get that filth out of my product!
“Folks who want porn can buy an android.”
“You might care more about porn when you have kids. It’s not about freedom, it’s about Apple trying to do the right thing for its users.”
TBH as much good as he did, he sounds like a pretty boring square, one of those people who liked drugs in their 20s then got married and lived the entire remainder of his life alternating between home and his suburban office.
I don’t know the guy, I’m just going based on what was reported of his work.
In general I don’t think people who consider cities like Santa Clara or Cupertino to have very good taste, despite the popularity of square American suburban living.
I don't think Jobs would have cared if you thought he had good taste or not, or whether you think he's a "square." As for boring, it's already been widely documented in newspapers, magazines, books, and online that his short life was 1000 times more interesting than your life ever will be.
Adult humans who decide for other adult humans what they should or should not be allowed to choose to read on their own devices are lame as fuck.