.PHOTO, .PHOTOGRAPHY, .PHOTOS, .PICS, .PICTURES
This should offend everyone.
.PHOTO, .PHOTOGRAPHY, .PHOTOS, .PICS, .PICTURES
This should offend everyone.
.ACCENTURE
.AIRBUS
.AMERICANEXPRESS
.AMERICANFAMILY
.AVIANCA
.BAIDU
.BARCLAYCARD
.BARCLAYS
.BENTLEY
.BESTBUY
.BLOOMBERG
.BNPPARIBAS
.BOEHRINGER
.BUGATTI
.CALVINKLEIN
.CAPITALONE
.CITI
.EPSON
.ERICSSON
.FERRARI
.FUJITSU
.GMAIL
.GODADDY
.HDFC
.HDFCBANK
.HITACHI
.HYATT
.HYUNDAI
.JAGUAR
.JEEP
.JPMORGAN
.JUNIPER
.KERRYHOTELS
.KERRYLOGISTICS
.KERRYPROPERTIES
.LACAIXA
.LAMBORGHINI
.LANDROVER
.LANXESS
.LPLFINANCIAL
.MASERATI
.MATTEL
.MCKINSEY
.MICROSOFT
.MITSUBISHI
.NETFLIX
.NORTHWESTERNMUTUAL
.OLAYANGROUP
.PANASONIC
.PRAMERICA
.SAMSUNG
.SCHAEFFLER
.SCJOHNSON
.SONY
.STCGROUP
.SUZUKI
.SWATCH
.TIFFANY
.TOSHIBA
.VIRGIN
.VOLKSWAGEN
It's disgusting.In reality, you have .gov for government, .com for business, .org for organisations who don’t care how much traffic they get, local country TLDs for if you operate a service for one country only, and tons and tons of garbage.
com is the only TLD that has any value for international commerce. It doesn’t matter that .netflix exists, because it will never be used for anything productive. The problem is that you can only ever count on a person knowing .com and their local TLD. Everything else either won’t register with people as being an actual domain name, or will look like a scam to most people.
The internet is locked into this system, and it’s one that cannot possibly scale. The explosion in new TLDs is an attempt to address that. But we don’t need to worry about how disgusting it is, because it’s an attempt that has failed.
I would suggest two issues that are more concerning is that there is nothing that seems to be a realistic alternative or solution, and that the way this problem has played out has diminished the actual usefulness of domain names, with that gap being filled by the google search engine.
I can't recall the technical term for it though, and my search engine couldn't help me find it within a few minutes.
Countries view ccTLDs as their sovereign property and territory on the Internet, and refuse to be (involuntarily) bound to any rules or requirements as a matter of sovereignty. It’s a huge source of geopolitical conflict within the IANA/ICANN split (and with DNS in general).
A number of countries have _voluntarily_ agreed to follow ICANN’s principles for good management and interoperability [1], but jurisdictions gonna jurisdict I guess.
It does feel a touch dystopian though.
Local domains are easy to implement right by registering any domain name (even a free one) and setting that as your local DNS domain. If you register pantalaimon.gq and set that as your local DNS suffix, any non-FQDN hostname should be resolved to host.pantalaimon.gq. Entering http://netflix/ will resolve to http://netflix.pantalaimon.gq/. Such a system also gives you more control over your local DNS, as you can do more than A and AAAA records now. Only http://netflix./ would that actually constitute as a FQDN and bypass the local domain.
I used to use internal DNS infrastructure without a domain until I realised all DNS queries were being sent to DNS because the DNS suffix my ISP appended (something like example.com), resulting in occasional queries to servername.example.com that failed.
If you use domains to refer to localhost, just use .localhost as the TLD: it's been reserved for that exact use.
https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-chapin-rfc2606bis-00.html#ne...
Consider putting your "local" hostnames under .localdomain .domain .lan .home .host or .corp
Personally I think .lan and .corp are the best options.
Why is this?
Only for the US government.
JC Penny, Intel, Esurance, Vistaprint among companies terminating their TLDs.
It basically says, that any given channel starts out small and high-quality, so engaging is easy and credible. As it grows marketers have to be smarter and larger to stand out. Read it as a consumer, and they're basically talking about a scorched-earth loudness war for your attention.
[0] https://medium.com/point-nine-news/the-lifecycle-of-lead-gen...
But in my example -- I can't imagine a site that belongs under exactly one of these TLDs. So any site that falls under one of them, conflicts mentally with a site of the same name under at least one of the others. So this hasn't expanded the namespace at all.
Instead, it has poisoned the namespace. Did you want joe.photo or joe.photos? I literally just made up that example, and oh look, it's the same site. Of course it is; the moneygrab was successful. Because otherwise, users will not remember which one was right, and the two sites are competing for the same name with the same meaning.