Postcard stamped in 1920 delivered 100 years later
fox17online.com
fox17online.com
I wanted to send her the message "Happy Belated Thirtieth Birthday!", which is 30 characters, via postcards, one character per postcard.
I found 30 post offices in unique places throughout the U.S. (For example, I found a town that had the same name as her given name in Illinois. I found another with my name, etc.)
I used Zazzle to print a custom post card for each location with a picture of the location on one side, and a large block letter on the other. I just did a Google image search at the time to find photos of the location. Here's the image I used for "Truth or Consequences, NM":
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/68/Truth_or...
I then hand wrote a message on each postcard that started with the block letter. This was because she'd be receiving the postcards one-by-one and I didn't want her to realize right away that a message was being spelled out. It would seem like a postcard I might send her from that location if I'd actually been there.
I also found a set of 50-state stamps the USPS had previously issued on eBay, and used the correct state's stamp for its postcard.
Finally, I round-tripped each postcard through its respective post office by mailing it inside an envelope addressed to the postmaster at that post office along with a note to the post master:
Dear Postmaster:
I am mailing my sister 30 postcards from 30 towns for her 30th birthday. I have enclosed a postcard, which I ask be hand-cancelled with a postmark from your town. To protect the postcard from machine cancels in its journey through the mail system, I have enclosed a stamped envelope addressed to my sister in which to seal and mail the postcard. Thank you very much for your time!
I wasn't sure if this would work, but damn if she didn't get all 30 postcards each properly postmarked.
I dropped them all in the mail in NC. Some went as far as Alaska and Hawaii.
She received them in Miami. I think she got the first one within a few days and the rest dribbled in over the next two weeks.
Edit: here they are after she received them all:
And how long did it take her to realize what the message was?
It's been eight years. I think she texted me after she got the first few. I don't recall when she realized there was a message. I seem to recall they came in in batches. She's get none for a day or two and then get three or four. I also recall there wasn't a lot of correlation between how far they travelled and when she got them. It probably mostly depended how long it took the post master at each post office to re-mail.
What she did was got an atlas and identified every town whose name was at all romantic. (Things like Loving, New Mexico.) The postcards that she had come back appeared to be from random girls with as different as she could make the handwriting to be. It was all timed to show up on Valentine's day.
After getting two stacks of postcards from girls with cryptic messages like, "I hope to see you again" and "Visit any time", my brother got a reputation for being a total stud.
https://www.nbcnews.com/nightly-news/why-brides-grooms-are-f...
Comparisons like this are what is going to lead us into the next 100 years.
To confirm though, I am indeed not that or any other mathematician and I can’t claim any credit for any contribution to category theory. I’m simply a programmer who knows a little bit about a few things, no one special :)
For general purpose web development response times, I like to refer to p99 and p95 for general healthiness. P50 doesn't do much more than make me feel better. Max has its uses, it can be a good timeout gauge as the commenter above me pointed out. If the RATE at which max values occur changes, you may have something worth investigating.
To my point though, you mention that you noticed a "consistent" max of 2hr. Meaning the consistency was the interesting part. You probably consider this issue to be more important than some other hypothetical issue that caused, say, literally a single request to have a 2hr latency on Tuesday.
In other words, if you monitored over a period that was long enough to establish a statistically significant p99.9 or even p99.99 and then measured those percentiles, you still would have not only caught this issue, but also distinguished it from the other hypothetical issue. Monitoring your maximum and worrying about consistently high maximums might be a more effective mechanism, but in principle, you still care more about top percentiles.
Just like monitoring the arithmetic average ain't completely useless either. It's just far from the most important metric.
We didn't understand that as first, and several colleagues and I put postcards and some expense reports into them. I can see the postcard arriving 100 years later!
This was Accenture, and at the time, original receipts were required. Luckily they made an exception on photocopied receipts when I explained what had happened.
Nowadays in Germany they just take the cash register part with the money out and walk to the Tresor room, or have sort of wallets and a colleague delivers the money to there. Example taken from a Kaufland.
It could have slipped behind a counter at the original post office and been uncovered when that office was decommissioned 35 years later. Then it would have made its way to a newer sorting facility where either it could have been misplaced again or, more likely, been stuffed in a cabinet somewhere (as I doubt USPS was as adamant about delivering lost mail in the 1950's). That facility could easily be in operation until today - or decommissioned very recently.
No idea if anything like this actually occurred. But at 400M+ letters / day, USPS has the scale for unusual circumstances like this to be somewhat regular occurrences.
In the UK it was up to 12 times / day in cities!
Also, cf. "Going Postal" by Terry Pratchett.
Meanwhile I have significant less mail, and on mail that had a stamp I see it took them a week to deliver it (this is local mail, not international). Never seen I such issues with mail as long as I lived here.
The truth is that USPS performance has improved dramatically over the last two weeks. You just haven't heard about that because there is very little appetite for good news. See here:
https://carriers.shipbob.com/#lp-pom-block-1909
Our company (bottomless.com, YC W19) uses USPS to do real time delivery and keeps a very close eye on arrival times. Our own internal arrival time data has normalized considerably as well.
Their Informed Delivery service (where I can see what mail is being delivered to me) now says my address is not covered, when it worked for me 2 months ago (not sure when it was disabled, since recently I started worrying about lost mail).
Before it all started, USPS actually operated really well, there were times I got packages faster than through UPS (don't really use FedEx). Actually you can see that from your site they were on average 2 days, when typically everyone was expecting 3 days.
You conjugated the future semiconditionally modified subinverted plagal past subjunctive intentional incorrectly.
Neither! (Or, rather, it's DNA's very elaborate grammar joke that I stole.)
The postmark is obviously printed by a modern (impact?) printer. Why the post office would accept a mailing with incorrect postage for current times is notable - maybe someone making the call just shrugged it off an allowed it to pass.
Wtf sort of professional journalist writes "gonna" in an article on a news site?
In this case it seems particularly clear: look at the glue markings in the middle of the card. This indicates this postcard probably has been sitting in a collectors' album for quite some time, before someone thought of removing it and pulling a joke.
This sort of thing happens all the time by people who post the card after it has been sitting in a collection for some time. Since it is a valid card, the post office will deliver it nonetheless. That's what they do! (Here's a Dutch example: https://www.ad.nl/binnenland/kerstkaart-na-ruim-halve-eeuw-a...)
Disclaimer: I checked this with an acclaimed philatelic collector.
Are we sure this is not the plot to an upcoming horror film?
Also, the address still EXISTS after a hundred years? No rezoning, no town name change or street name change? Many rural houses built in 1920 would not have survive 100 years without major overhauls.
But the fact that the story was posted by the recipient of the post card, to a Facebook Group, and then only hit the news after going viral means it probably wasn't done by a PR company.
Having done some of this "black hat PR" myself I can tell you that we don't typically cover our tracks that well.
We almost always plant bullshit by going to the news outlets themselves, or paying a blogger to put up an article on BI, Forbes, of HuffPo.
On a completely unrelated note, have you guys heard Amazon is hiring 33,000 new employees with a compensation package average of 150k? Just to help with unemployment during this time of crisis. Pretty cool of them to do that.
Of course, USPS has been politicized to an unreasonable degree, so folks are reading it in that context.
By the way, barcodes were introduced to encode ZIP codes, and ZIP codes were introduced in 1963.
A bit of a sensationalized headline. Just an old postcard, the postmark is recent.
No, the postmark is 1920 according to the article.
For example my address says Flat 7 of 60 My Street, and a friend lives at Flat 10 of 74 My Street. But my delivery point is a letter box in the front door of my home, whereas his delivery point is just a locked box at street level. Timed locks allow the postman to enter my building despite not having a key, so as to deliver post to my front door, whereas his building doesn't do this.
The company (almost everything in the UK is privatised because Tory ideology says this is a good idea even if it clearly isn't) delivering post owns very detailed maps of where all these delivery points are, because of course it needs its employees to visit all those points to deliver post, whereas it needn't care where in some sense an "address" is other than where the post is to be delivered.
My (Collins) paper dictionary offers:
"The conventional form by which the location of a building is described" and nothing close to what you've suggested.
Wiktionary offers: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/address
"A description of the location of a property, usually with at least [...]"
The second postmark suggests that this was possibly redeposited into the mail somewhere.
It is far from inconceivable for a postcard to be lost in USPS-land and then years-later complete its journey, getting a bar code affixed. This would not be the first time this has happened. Other times, entire bags of sorted mail were lost and recovered decades later and then delivered.
The remote barcoding system is used for hand written addresses and the post office adds them.
Typically when someone uses Inteligent Mail Barcode, they mechanize the address too. And if you are going for a spoof, you wouldn’t encode an IMB if you are hand writing the address.
If the mail got lost on its way to the sorting facility, it was probably never stamped and therefore just had to be thrown into a mailbox again.
The barcode would have been printed this year when the postcard was processed in the sorting facility.
Yet strangely enough, the postal service tracking system updated the status about a month ago, from "In Transit" to "In Transit - Arriving Late". Derp, derp.
Anyway, I've pretty much given up on them at this point, but I wonder if like 100 years from now, or at some other arbitrary point in time down the line, somebody who lives here after me is going to find a package of plastic worms in the mailbox...
I did recently have a rather long wait for a book that was shipped from, aaah... I think it was either Germany or England. I think it took about a month and a half to arrive.
Of course I understand that COVID has had a major impact, but the one from Texas still annoys me. I mean, c'mon... over two months from TX to NC? Give me a break. :-(
The content was a few ceramic plates, a few books, some tea - nothing particularly expensive, but these were items that we bought during our stay in Japan.
I hate this. I hate the person or persons that have done this. I pretty much feel my own person has been violated.
Also, knowing USPS, I'm certain that nothing will ever happen to these THIEVES, and that there will be no easy way for me to force them to open an investigation.
Sorry for the venting... But I somehow had to express this inner rage somewhere, and when I saw this thread I couldn't resist.
Call the postal inspector office in your area. They take mail theft very seriously.