We are also working on a seed-round of investment. It's an exciting field with plenty of room for competition. And it's so important for fighting climate change! We need to build this asap. https://www.terramenthq.com/
We are also working on a seed-round of investment. It's an exciting field with plenty of room for competition. And it's so important for fighting climate change! We need to build this asap. https://www.terramenthq.com/
I suspect that if the water table is high enough to cause problems, you'd do pumped hydro storage instead.
A lot of solar power is out in the desert where the water table is hundreds or even thousands of feet below surface.
And pumped storage still doesn't work as you'd need surface area for new lakes. Also, not sure if you'd want to pump out huge amounts of ground water for pumped storage, lowering the water table for everyone.
1. So the units are actually modular, i.e., not connected. Aha. If a unit jams, it's annoying but not fatal, as all the units above it continue to be usable.
2. Since the weight units are separate, then the force on the gearing (both wall and unit) is constant and thus the wear and tear is manageable.
3. The max energy stored is when all the weights are horizontal, of course. So there needs to be a transmission line built into the shaft, along with a motor/generator per weight unit. Some cleverness needed so the transmitted power is passed to (and received from) the correct units. The sliding contact where power is transmitted would also be a major possible point of failure.
4. Yeah, that's the downside of separate modular units. Each unit now needs to transmit/receive power.
5. It would seem prudent to build two or more shafts adjacent to each other. So if there is a problem in one shaft, you can go down the other and fix it. Increases reliability significantly.
6. If the units and power transmission are waterproof, water in the shaft isn't too much of an issue. You might lose ~20% of energy storage due to the buoyancy of the water, but that's it. Might save energy not having to constantly pump out the shaft.
7. Right. Definitely need a failsafe mechanism so a unit doesn't plunge down (say, when the motor/generator clutch fails) and take out the units at the bottom.
Cool idea. Good luck with power transmission.
- Regarding jams, failures, etc. These should be extremely rare, but in the event, each unit is designed to "disengage" if needed so it's just dumb weight, and modules adjacent to it will be designed to lift it. Then when the train is above ground, the unit can be swapped out for another one and repaired while the system keeps operating. - Yup failsafe mechanisms will be built in as well. - Yeah each unit has its own motor/generator. A power line will enter through the module's axle.
I note from the website: "Our patented technology is based on a simple principle ..."
I think it's a great idea but I don't see what there is to patent or what IP they could defend ...
edit: oh sorry, I think you meant gravitricity sorry. I'm not sure what they're patenting. Also I don't think their patents are in the US.
How about home use? Could it be used small-scale, e.g. as an alternative to Tesla's PowerPack? I've long been curious about distributed energy solutions, from heating (e.g. cogeneration / CHP, heat pumps, geothermal energy, solar+battery for off-grid energy), could this be a low-cost, low-tech, low-maintenance, low-risk alternative to batteries?
I know Pennsylvania and New York both have 20 MW storage systems that takes up a few acres and are relatively cheap per unit of storage.
A weight you can just hang there
A basic thing to understand about electricity storage is that there are very different needs for different kinds of storage. Flywheels from what I understand are for very shortterm storage needs, i.e. balancing out shortterm fluctuations in electricity use vs. generation. But they're unsuitable for any kind of longterm storage, because they loose power over time.
In the long run with a high-solar-high-wind-scenario we'll need some seasonal storage to get us over a couple of weeks in some circumstances. This will need some storage that doesn't loose power over time.
(FWIW I have no idea if these gravitational storage techs will play any role in that, and one can be doubtful about it.)
Basically flywheel cannot store energy for a long time. It needs to be constantly used to be effective.
Megawatts measure the peak discharge rate, not that amount of energy stored.
For a fixed number of dollars of investment, gravity will store far more joules of energy.