The bits I've read/seen recently were definitely leaning far harder on the (as they perceived it) greater good than any "let's unambiguously[1] be evil" rhetoric.
- Goebbels' Sportpalast 1943 speech[2] https://research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/goeb36...
- Triumph of the Will 1935 https://archive.org/details/TriumphOfTheWillgermanTriumphDes...
- Hitler's Sportpalast 1933 speech https://www.stern.de/politik/geschichte/sportpalast-rede-die...
[1] granted, the ambiguity is up for discussion. But I think any criterion that colours the speeches above as unambiguously evil would also tar many current regimes with the same brush.
[2] a rationale: defending 2'000 years of "western civilisation" https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24137060