The USSC has ruled that binding arbitration clauses in shrink-wrap consumer contracts are legal and enforceable.
For the usual reasons, congress has refused to change the law to vacate the ruling.
For the usual reasons, congress has refused to change the law to vacate the ruling.
For this drive, there is no explicit acceptance of the terms given and the terms are unavailable before not just purchase, but before opening of the box.
Thank you for the comment, I've edited mine to reflect the ambiguity.