Heroku terminates Ruqqus site and account without a warning or an explanation
ruqqus.com
ruqqus.com
This problem happens a lot with reddit competitors whose selling point is they don't "censor" (e.g. Voat). What happens is the people who are so extreme they got banned from reddit end up on your platform, and these people are generally pretty terrible. Next thing you know you're hosting a predominantly far right racist discussion forum and your hosting provider wants nothing to do with you.
Opening the front page of Ruqqus shows a lot of content actually objecting to racism, for instance, this post:
https://ruqqus.com/post/31lq/their-goal
which highlights and objects to a tweet that says:
"Why should there be a place for white people in our better world? As long as white people are around, they will continue to make our better world impossible. BIPOCS are the ones who are in this together. White people are not welcome or needed."
This kind of racist rhetoric is rampant and easily found on places like Twitter or Reddit. Scrolling through the content on the Ruqqus front page I didn't see any racism. I did see a lot of angry posts about BLM-linked violence and anti-white racism, but that's the sort of thing people are theoretically meant to be angry about, isn't it?
This can happen with any app even if it's more unlikely.
It's definitely not good for the company caught on the receiving end of such a decision, of course, but the hosting company is optimizing for themselves, as all companies are inherently selfish. And given how much racist garbage Ruqqus is hosting, I don't think Heroku cares too much about any hardship incurred.
They clearly never read the Heroku terms of service which have this at the top:
>If you are found to be in violation of our policies at any time, as determined by Heroku in its sole discretion, we may warn you or suspend or terminate your account
Literally Heroku says that they may terminate you with no warning.
edit: And based on a quick glance at the site a five year old could see how it violates multiple parts of the acceptable use policy.
I've never used the site before but, looking at just a fraction of the content, it's the gutter of the internet. Obviously that's my opinion, but if I were Heroku I'd have probably made the same decision.
"Ruqqus is an open source, USA-based, First-Amendment focused social platform restoring free speech to the internet."
If I'm not surprised, why are they?
Assuming Ruqqus is in the EDT time zone, this means they got notified shortly after 4 PM on a Friday that their account would be terminated in 24 hours.
Does that mean that 23 of the 24 hours they would have to download all their data would be outside of normal work hours, with 16 hours of those 24 being on a weekend?
I can't think of any reasonable justification for such short notice. If it is a TOS violation that the hosting company is not willing to let them try to fix, account termination should be several business days after the immediate live environment suspension.
What's the audience like? Is it just a competitor, or a voat-like site to receive those people... not welcome in more mainstream places?
On the other hand, isn't Heroku a really expensive choice if you are running a popular website with many users?
(This is one of the few examples of such sites showing technical competence, so I wouldn't put too much stock in their decision to go with Heroku, and I wouldn't worry about your own apps.)
It reads to me the site is something similar to Reddit.
I don't make the rules, those are just the rules.
Wherever you host next try fronting with Cloudflare and make sure your origin servers only accept connections from their servers. Cloudflare generally supports free speech and it provides a layer of indirection to keep people from complaining to your hosting provider. Make sure you don't expose your origin IPs in server messages or DNS.
It is in fact protected in the United States:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speech_in_the_United_Stat...
> ...and companies certainly aren't obligated to enable it.
Nevertheless, it is important to know which private companies do support free speech, including all the ugly bits.
Incorrect, it is the US First Amendment that doesn't affect private companies but the First Amendment != freedom of speech. Your statement is a uniquely American misconception.
Freedom of speech, as a philosophy, affects everyone. That's why the ACLU has historically defended some rather deplorable people; liberal principles matter.