With a simple piece of paper, engineers create self-powered, wireless keyboard
smithsonianmag.com
smithsonianmag.com
Why do reporters still persist with these silly signoffs, that are actually wrong. ( They do it on the evening news as well as these pop science things). The paper you throw in the bin today is actually of no further use to anyone. Just like the glass of water you are drinking isn't going to be used to make hydrogen gas for a car, nor sandcastle you just built for silicon in the latest integrated circuit.
It would be even nicer if they were better at reporting facts.
For a circular area of Humor with radius Z. Best served fresh.
Most articles can be summed up in 3 or less factual sentences but nobody would read that.
I believe the journalist is actually making a damning, albeit poorly introduced, argument against the device as confronted to cultural expectations.
If these keyboards become widespread, it could become easy to mistakenly bin them, because “it is just paper” and it is not obvious that there is a potentially expensive coating and invisible circuit printed on it.
It is a similar argument to the one made against Bitcoin, in which it is all too easy to lose access to money because we hold a cultural habit to discard old hard drives – but now suddenly, they are also wallets containing potentially large sums.
the moisture/oil resistant part is a big deal for actually using it in the real world
In fact when camera enabled glasses looked like they were going to be a thing that was the very thing I imagined taking off. You grab a piece of paper and haphazardly draw a bunch of keys on it and your glasses with a little AI do the rest
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmKdtAePxy8
They've been available for a few years now.
https://www.geeky-gadgets.com/geeky-gadgets-the-bluetooth-la...
This is actually better than that. They created a spray on invisible circuit board that can both detect touch inputs and generate enough electricity to power a bluetooth radio. They achieved all this for a unit cost of 25 cents. That's a pretty amazing achievement and opens up some quite practical uses.
Imagine something like Nintendo Labo, but with so many more opportunities for interactivity.
Another idea, imagine a student's notebook that synchronized their writing with their phone.
We needed a small battery coin for some unique interactions, not sure if that was needed, & not sure/didnt read what Purdue is doing different with self-power.
More seriously, we've seen attempts to make flat keyboards [0]. The lack of haptic feedback limits them to niche devices. If they can do more than just input devices though, I'd be much more interested.
[0] https://www.amazon.com/AGS-Wireless-Projection-Bluetooth-Sma...
None of which matters though, because that isn't the use case on display here. The use shown is extremely similar to the projected keyboard to which I linked, which has remained a niche application.
So, my point stands: A use-case other than inferior versions of input devices is needed to demonstrate the value of this innovation. It is an interesting innovation, and my inability to immediately think of commercially viable applications for it doesn't change that. It's great that we come up with novel advances like this, and have them in our massive tool chest to pull them out once we connect the technology to a practical application. All I'm saying here is that, as presented, we don't have that connection to a practical application.
Am I expected to believe that friction caused by pressing your finger on paper can supply enough power to make a successful bluetooth transmission?
Maybe with three pieces of paper there will be enuogh room to feel the "travel" and feedback?