From a /newest thread, I've found:
https://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1053.html
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2001/12/all-you...
but surely there are better resources?
(The indirect approach taken in the latter article agrees with Linebarger[3] on counterpropaganda:
> "Enemy propaganda should, in well conducted operations, be taken into account only when it becomes an asset. That is, the enemy need only be heeded when he tells a whopping lie, or comes forth with a piece of hyprocrisy so offensive to his own people that it needs little improvement to be adapted for counterpropaganda. Most enemy themes are beyond reach, especially those of inter-ideological warfare. The Nazis and Russians made the best propaganda against each other when they got down to the basic necessities of life, not when they were trying to weave finespun theories about each other's way of thinking or of life. Refutation is a joy; it is delightful to talk back. But the best propaganda is only incidentally counterpropaganda.")
[1] it is my hope that after US D's and R's learn to converse with each other, they will apply the same techniques to converse with, say, french interlocutors, or even optimistically, other others.
[2] "Actual happiness always looks pretty squalid in comparison with the over-compensations for misery. And, of course, stability isn't nearly so spectacular as instability. And being contented has none of the glamour of a good fight against misfortune, none of the picturesqueness of a struggle with temptation, or a fatal overthrow by passion or doubt. Happiness is never grand."
[3] http://www.gutenberg.org/files/48612/48612-h/48612-h.htm#Pag...