New collision-detection technology used in Little Big Planet, GTA IV and others
wildbunny.co.uk
wildbunny.co.uk
Edit: that was before I saw that the follow-up on the same blog was also posted here today. I stand corrected. The article is spam, please don't upvote!
How does this become spam? Or, let's say you used the wrong word and didn't mean "spam" -- how is this article or its author somehow bad for HN right now? I add "right now" because I think the answer would be different if the user had been around for a year or two.
I am not looking to prove anything here or argue. I am really curious why you think I should not upvote a submission I found interesting.
I'm not a troll if that's what you're implying. I may be a condescending douchebag who irritates you but that's not the same.
I chose the word spam because it turns out the article was posted to bolster pageviews on someones blog. Whether it's actually commercial or just egomaniacal is not really relevant. What matters is this link was posted to sell me something.
> I am really curious why you think I should not upvote a submission I found interesting.
Please read my comment in its entirety. You'll find that I have also upvoted it and I have also stated that it's an interesting article. There is however a larger motive at work behind posting this to HN which became apparent to me later.
To make it extra clear: one article is fine, it's interesting and engaging. Posting another one about the same topic linking to the same blog within hours is gratuitous.