Run iPhone Apps Directly From Your Browser With Pieceable Viewer
techcrunch.com
techcrunch.com
Project page: http://www.iemu.org
Github: https://github.com/cmwdotme/QEMU-s5l89xx-port
Screenshots: http://www.cmw.me/lcdworking.png http://www.cmw.me/ichargetoo.png http://www.iemu.org/oibiemu.png
Author's Twitter: http://twitter.com/cmwdotme
These guys put together a cool little simulator and you use it embed a single app into your article, thus forcing all 100k visitors to your site to DOS the thing??? Why not link to the site and let people hit it on their own, thus spreading the load out to a few different apps and giving the server a chance to handle your traffic?
I feel for these guys because TechCrunch did the same thing to us when they reviewed Twiddla. They linked a single meeting room, thus essentially sending 10000 people into one conference call. "wow, this is crowded." "who changed the page?" "why did my drawing get erased?"
It was a full hour of chaos before we noticed what they'd done and pushed a new build to specifically redirect traffic from that meeting to the homepage. Not that TC traffic is particularly useful in terms of long term customers, but guys, at least try to think about what will actually happen if you deep link stuff like that.
http://gigaom.com/mobile/amazons-testdrive-is-the-real-stren...
That being said, it is ridiculous that there is no built in way to take screens of an app on an Android phone (like the power + home iOS combo). Since Android has the concept of a secure canvas (e.g.sensitive content), this should be stock.
Lack of easy screenshots makes it harder for normal users to blog about and help review and promote an Android app.
They must be capturing the output at some deeper layer though since OpenGL doesn't render (but it does run).
Kinda dodgy.
The first version was actually all standard web stuff, but the performance was just a little bit below what we wanted. Flash works for now.
The pricing plans we've put up so far are definitely intended for agencies / dev shops that want to share apps-in-progress with clients. We know there's a lot more we could do with this, though - we're just waiting for everyone to tell us what they want before we add new pricing :-)